Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements
- Posted
- May 8, 2026
- Comment period
- May 8, 2026 – Aug 7, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09157
- CFR
- 27 CFR Part 478
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Online retail safety limitations | Preservation of in-person transactions | Remote and online firearm transfers |
|---|---|---|---|
Everytown for Gun Safety AdvocacyOppose Everytown for Gun Safety opposes the proposed rule because it allows for more remote and online firearm sales without in |
19 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 170 comments from the past week
170 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 22, 2026Massasauga OutfittersOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it favors large online retailers over small local gun shops and replaces human judgment with automated processes. They specifically request that the rule be struck down regarding the direct shipping of standard firearms.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Steve's Outdoor SportsOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed direct-shipping rules for firearms, arguing that they will harm local gun dealers and reduce the effectiveness of face-to-face safety checks. They advocate for maintaining current requirements that favor local shop interactions over online sales.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Get Guns Now IncOpposeOther
The commenter opposes the proposed rule allowing direct-to-door shipping of firearms, arguing that it will harm local gun shops and compromise public safety by removing face-to-face interactions. They express concern over the costs passed to buyers and the potential for firearms to reach the wrong hands without the "personal touch" of a physical store.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026The Gun CaveOpposeBusiness
A local gun shop owner in Louisiana opposes the proposed rule, arguing that face-to-face transactions are necessary to identify safety issues and straw buyers. The commenter expresses concern that the rule will harm small local businesses in favor of large online retailers and impose unnecessary fees on buyers.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026The Sportsman's ShopOpposeBusiness
A local gun shop owner opposes the rule because it favors large online retailers over small local dealers. The commenter argues that direct shipping undermines community safety and local business viability, and requests the removal of the direct shipping provision for standard firearms.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Rick’s Sporting Goods LLCOpposeBusiness
The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that allowing direct shipping of firearms will harm small local gun shops and undermine the effectiveness of in-person sales. They express concern that video calls and software cannot adequately verify a buyer's age or intent compared to face-to-face interactions.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Anchor Gun Works LLCOpposeBusiness
A small firearms dealer opposes the proposed revision to non-over-the-counter firearms transaction requirements. The commenter argues that allowing direct online sales will bypass local dealers and harm small businesses that rely on in-person or phone-based customer interactions.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Total FirearmsOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe allowing direct shipping of firearms will harm small local shops and replace human judgment with automated systems. They argue that the current in-person system is more effective for building trust and preventing bad sales.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Maryland Elite FirearmsOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe it will harm local gun shops by favoring large online retailers. They argue that the rule undermines the role of local experts in safety and request the removal of the direct-shipping provisions for standard firearms.
Read comment → - Jul 16, 2026SUPERIOR OUTFITTERSOpposeBusiness
A Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL) opposes the proposed rule, arguing that removing in-person safeguards weakens the current system for preventing illegal firearm purchases. The commenter expresses concerns that shifting responsibility to delivery personnel increases security risks, such as theft and fraudulent transactions, and urges the ATF to preserve existing requirements.
Read comment →
