Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements
- Posted
- May 8, 2026
- Comment period
- May 8, 2026 – Aug 7, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09157
- CFR
- 27 CFR Part 478
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Online retail safety limitations | Preservation of in-person transactions | Remote and online firearm transfers |
|---|---|---|---|
Everytown for Gun Safety AdvocacyOppose Everytown for Gun Safety opposes the proposed rule because it allows for more remote and online firearm sales without in |
19 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 125 comments from the past week
125 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 14, 2026Marylanders to Prevent Gun ViolenceOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment → - Jul 13, 2026Everytown for Gun SafetyOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment → - Jul 12, 2026Aggie Perilli Communications InternationalOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Laura BuckOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter, a private individual, opposes the proposed rule allowing the direct shipping of standard firearms from online retailers. They argue that the rule removes the "human judgment" and "red flag" monitoring provided by local gun shop owners during in-person transactions.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Teresa BlumensteinOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 22, 2026Amy ArcaroOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Carl PrellwitzOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Garrett BurdickOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Mara BertoliOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment →
