Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements

An FFL dealer with over 40 years of experience opposes the proposed revisions, arguing that they will facilitate straw purchases and criminal activity while creating a monopoly for large retailers. The commenter asserts that the current system is effective and that the proposed changes would undermine existing law enforcement cooperation.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe it increases the risk of straw purchases and public safety threats. They argue that requiring transfers through gun shops provides a necessary layer of scrutiny that direct delivery lacks.

Richard Blakeman, owner of Classic Jewelry & Loan Barboursville, opposes the proposed rule because he believes it will make it easier for criminals to obtain firearms. He argues that the rule will undermine the ability of local dealers to vet customers and could lead to increased crime and firearm confiscation.

The commenter, identifying as a Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL), opposes the proposed revisions because they believe the rules will not effectively prevent straw purchases and will instead place an undue regulatory burden on law-abiding citizens and FFLs. They argue that the current systems are already overwhelmed and that new requirements will not solve the underlying issues.

The owner of Guns N Gear Sports LLC, a federally licensed firearms dealer, opposes the proposed revisions because they would expand non-over-the-counter firearms transactions and remove the critical in-person identity verification provided by licensed dealers. The commenter argues that a direct-to-home shipping model would increase illegal firearms and fraud by eliminating the human element of professional judgment at retail locations.

Niko opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it will weaken background check systems and increase public safety risks. The commenter expresses concern that the rule will allow firearms to reach criminals, traffickers, and underage children.

Shela, a gun violence survivor, opposes the proposed rule because she believes it expands remote gun sales and removes the face-to-face oversight provided by Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs). She argues that the rule undermines the ATF's mission to prevent gun trafficking and increase community safety.