Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements

The commenter opposes the proposed rules for non-over-the-counter firearms transactions, arguing that direct shipping favors large online sellers over small local gun shops. They express concern that digital checks cannot replace the "gut instinct" of local dealers and request the removal of direct-shipping rules from the proposal.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule for direct-to-door firearm shipping, arguing that it will harm local gun shops and decrease neighborhood safety. They advocate for maintaining a focus on local, in-person sales and the existing NFA approval process.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it favors large online retailers over small, local firearm shops. They express concern that direct-shipping requirements will harm rural businesses and remove the human judgment involved in in-person sales.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe it will harm small local firearms dealers by allowing large online retailers to dominate the market through direct shipping. They argue that the current in-person requirements are sufficient and request that the direct-shipping provisions for standard firearms be removed.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it removes human judgment from firearm sales and allows for direct shipping of standard firearms. They argue that local shops provide essential safety training and community trust that online retailers cannot replicate.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule allowing direct-to-door shipping of standard firearms, arguing that it will harm local gun shops and lack sufficient oversight compared to current systems. They request that the provisions for direct-shipping GCA firearms be struck to protect local jobs.

Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. supports the proposed rule to modernize firearms transactions through remote identity verification, citing benefits for consumer convenience and operational efficiency. The company requests specific clarifications regarding reliance on third-party credential service providers and the ability to implement these systems across multiple licensed facilities under common ownership.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.