Americans for Prosperity Foundation
AdvocacySupport
Modification of 2022 consent order
Order duration and sunset policy
Government trustworthiness
Twitter, Inc., FTC Docket No. C-4316, Petition to Reopen, Set Aside, or in the Alternative, Modify Order
FTC-2026-0727-0001Notice
Comments
76
Last activity Jul 2, 2026
Deadline
Closed on Jul 3, 2026
Closed Jul 3, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-3%
-3% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Twitter, Inc., FTC Docket No. C-4316, Petition to Reopen, Set Aside, or in the Alternative, Modify Order
- Posted
- Jun 3, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 3, 2026 – Jul 3, 2026
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
-3%
Net support
Support35Oppose37Other4
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -3% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Academic
2
Business
1
Government
4
Individual
59
Trade association
1
Advocacy
9
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted Jun 3, 2026Deadline Jul 3, 2026
Jun 1Jun 8Jun 15Jun 22Jun 29
Support35Oppose37Other4
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
36%
58%
7%
Advocacy
89%
11%
0%
Government
75%
25%
0%
Academic
50%
50%
0%
Business
100%
0%
0%
Trade association
100%
0%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Regulatory oversight of x12
Order duration and sunset policy9
Data privacy and security8
Enforcement of settlement terms8
Modification of 2022 consent order8
Twitter's free speech practices8
Successor liability of consent orders7
Ai privacy risks4
Government trustworthiness4
Platform content moderation4
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Modification of 2022 consent order | Order duration and sunset policy | Ai privacy risks | Enforcement of settlement terms | Government trustworthiness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Americans for Prosperity Foundation AdvocacySupport The Americans for Prosperity Foundation supports X Corp.’s petition to set aside or modify the FTC’s 2022 Order. | · | · | |||
DPEF, EFF, EPIC, and NCL et al. AdvocacyOppose A coalition of 15 public interest organizations is urging the FTC to reject X Corp.'s petition to set aside or modify th | · | · | · | ||
Heartbeat International AdvocacySupport Heartbeat International, Inc. | · | · | · | · | |
TechFreedom AdvocacySupport TechFreedom, a nonpartisan technology policy think tank, supports X's petition to modify or rescind its consent decree. | · | · | · | · | |
United States Chamber of Commerce Trade associationSupport The U.S. | · | · | · |
DPEF, EFF, EPIC, and NCL et al.
AdvocacyOppose
Ai privacy risks
Enforcement of settlement terms
Heartbeat International
AdvocacySupport
Modification of 2022 consent order
TechFreedom
AdvocacySupport
Order duration and sunset policy
United States Chamber of Commerce
Trade associationSupport
Modification of 2022 consent order
Order duration and sunset policy
3 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- Jul 2, 2026Comment from California Business & Consumer Services AgencyOpposeGovernment📎 Attachment
The California Business & Consumer Services Agency opposes the petition to terminate the FTC's order against X (formerly Twitter), arguing that the company has not met the necessary standards for a pardon. The Agency emphasizes the importance of data security for consumer protection and warns that granting the petition could appear to be a politically motivated favor.
Read comment → - Jul 2, 2026T SchmidtSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 2, 2026MD SHAHARIA HOSSAINOtherIndividual
The commenter expresses a neutral, cautious stance on X Corp.'s petition, emphasizing that any modifications to the FTC order must be based on objective evidence of improved compliance. They argue that while innovation is important, it should not come at the expense of consumer privacy and that any reduction in oversight must be carefully balanced with continued accountability.
Read comment → - Jun 6, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter argues that Twitter/X should be forced to continue operating under the existing order and face even deeper scrutiny and additional fines. They cite the company's failure to comply with CCPA and GDPR, issues with data deletion processes, and the misuse of personal information by its parent company's xAI service.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the petition to modify the order, arguing that the current ownership of Twitter/X poses a significant risk to consumer data safety. They highlight the mass layoffs of security and trust and safety personnel as evidence that the company is less capable of protecting user information than it was previously.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes setting aside or modifying the order, arguing that it should remain in full effect on X. They express a lack of trust in Elon Musk's ability to handle sensitive data securely, citing concerns over his past actions regarding Social Security data.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 4, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the petition to modify or set aside the order, arguing that Twitter/X has demonstrated a consistent disregard for user privacy and security. They cite past actions by the company's leadership as evidence that the company should not be released from its existing obligations.
Read comment →