Americans for Prosperity Foundation
AdvocacySupport
Modification of 2022 consent order
Order duration and sunset policy
Government trustworthiness
Twitter, Inc., FTC Docket No. C-4316, Petition to Reopen, Set Aside, or in the Alternative, Modify Order
FTC-2026-0727-0001Notice
Comments
76
Last activity Jul 2, 2026
Deadline
Closed on Jul 3, 2026
Closed Jul 3, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-3%
-3% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Twitter, Inc., FTC Docket No. C-4316, Petition to Reopen, Set Aside, or in the Alternative, Modify Order
- Posted
- Jun 3, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 3, 2026 – Jul 3, 2026
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
-3%
Net support
Support35Oppose37Other4
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -3% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Academic
2
Business
1
Government
4
Individual
59
Trade association
1
Advocacy
9
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted Jun 3, 2026Deadline Jul 3, 2026
Jun 1Jun 8Jun 15Jun 22Jun 29
Support35Oppose37Other4
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
36%
58%
7%
Advocacy
89%
11%
0%
Government
75%
25%
0%
Academic
50%
50%
0%
Business
100%
0%
0%
Trade association
100%
0%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Regulatory oversight of x12
Order duration and sunset policy9
Data privacy and security8
Enforcement of settlement terms8
Modification of 2022 consent order8
Twitter's free speech practices8
Successor liability of consent orders7
Ai privacy risks4
Government trustworthiness4
Platform content moderation4
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Modification of 2022 consent order | Order duration and sunset policy | Ai privacy risks | Enforcement of settlement terms | Government trustworthiness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Americans for Prosperity Foundation AdvocacySupport The Americans for Prosperity Foundation supports X Corp.’s petition to set aside or modify the FTC’s 2022 Order. | · | · | |||
DPEF, EFF, EPIC, and NCL et al. AdvocacyOppose A coalition of 15 public interest organizations is urging the FTC to reject X Corp.'s petition to set aside or modify th | · | · | · | ||
Heartbeat International AdvocacySupport Heartbeat International, Inc. | · | · | · | · | |
TechFreedom AdvocacySupport TechFreedom, a nonpartisan technology policy think tank, supports X's petition to modify or rescind its consent decree. | · | · | · | · | |
United States Chamber of Commerce Trade associationSupport The U.S. | · | · | · |
DPEF, EFF, EPIC, and NCL et al.
AdvocacyOppose
Ai privacy risks
Enforcement of settlement terms
Heartbeat International
AdvocacySupport
Modification of 2022 consent order
TechFreedom
AdvocacySupport
Order duration and sunset policy
United States Chamber of Commerce
Trade associationSupport
Modification of 2022 consent order
Order duration and sunset policy
3 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- Jun 29, 2026Americans for Prosperity FoundationSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Americans for Prosperity Foundation supports X Corp.’s petition to set aside or modify the FTC’s 2022 Order. They argue that the order's long duration and "scofflaw" provisions are overreaching, burdensome, and could be weaponized by the government to suppress First Amendment-protected speech.
Read comment → - Jun 30, 2026Comment from House Judiciary CommitteeSupportGovernment📎 Attachment
The House Committee on the Judiciary is submitting reports to the FTC regarding the "weaponization" of the agency against Twitter (now X) under previous leadership. The Committee argues that the FTC used its regulatory authority for partisan purposes to harass Elon Musk and supports the petition to set aside or modify the existing settlement order.
Read comment → - Jun 24, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOtherIndividual
The commenter, Travis John Dupre, expresses personal grievances regarding legal issues, rights violations, and financial damages. The comment does not address the specific proposed action regarding the Twitter, Inc. FTC Order.
Read comment → - Jun 18, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOtherIndividual
The commenter expresses deep distrust in the US government's ability or willingness to regulate corporations effectively. They argue that because the government is influenced by wealthy donors, any new regulations or public comment processes are ultimately futile and meaningless.
Read comment →