Comment from Anonymous
Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
Summary: The commenter opposes setting aside or modifying the order, arguing that it should remain in full effect on X. They express a lack of trust in Elon Musk's ability to handle sensitive data securely, citing concerns over his past actions regarding Social Security data.
I am opposed on setting aside or modifying the order, it should remain in full effect on X (formerly Twitter).
Elon Musk cannot be trusted to handle sensitive data securely. During his time as an agent?, director? at DOGE, he and/or his team improperly accessed and re-uploaded sensitive Social Security data to a different cloud server without any sort of checks or oversight, potentially risking millions of American's personal data. This happened under his watch as he was a special government employee. He failed on basic oversight for his temporary role in our government, and should not be given the benefit of the doubt when it comes to his companies.
The order should remain in full effect, and should not be modified in any way.