Permits; Applications, Issuances, etc.: Pesticide Experimental Use

An individual opposes the proposed action, expressing concerns about the ecological impact of eradicating a species and the potential for sterile mosquitoes to still transmit diseases. The commenter argues against the feasibility and safety of the project.

An individual is opposing the issuance of a pesticide experimental use permit for the release of male mosquitoes containing Wolbachia pipientis. The commenter argues that the release could have unforeseen ecological consequences, impact the food chain, cause human health issues, and set a dangerous precedent for human intervention in nature.

A Florida resident and small homesteader opposes the proposed release of laboratory-modified mosquitoes, arguing that the scale of the release poses irreversible risks to complex ecosystems. The commenter requests that the EPA require more comprehensive long-term studies and independent reviews before granting approval.

Beth Radcliffe opposes the proposed release of laboratory-modified mosquitoes in Florida and California, citing concerns over irreversible ecological consequences and the complexity of natural ecosystems. She argues that the burden of proof for long-term environmental safety has not been met and calls for more independent, long-term studies before authorization is granted.

An individual is opposing the pesticide experimental use permit for Google LLC to release male mosquitoes containing the Wolbachia pipientis wAlbB chemical. The commenter argues that the release could have unforeseen ecological consequences, harm the food chain, cause human health issues, and set a dangerous precedent for human intervention in nature.

A Florida resident opposes the proposed experimental use permit for releasing Wolbachia-infested mosquitoes, arguing that the project lacks public consent and notice. The commenter demands a public vote and expresses concerns about the potential disruption to the biological food chain.

An individual expresses strong opposition to the proposed action, citing concerns about geo-engineered mosquitoes, ticks, and chemicals being introduced into the environment. The commenter criticizes the EPA's role in these policies and expresses a lack of trust in the agency's environmental stewardship.

A private citizen opposes the proposed pesticide experimental use permit, expressing concern over the lack of accountability and transparency from the private tech company involved. The commenter argues that human intervention in nature often leads to unintended consequences and fears that the permit sets a dangerous precedent for private companies to influence public policy.

A North Florida resident opposes the pesticide experimental use permit, arguing that the local community has not been sufficiently informed or consulted. The commenter demands more transparency regarding the experiment's methodology, safety data, and environmental impacts before the permit is approved.