Permits; Applications, Issuances, etc.: Pesticide Experimental Use
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Permits; Applications, Issuances, etc.: Pesticide Experimental Use
Federal Register form Wednesday, May 6, 2026 (91 FR 24542) [EPA–HQ–OPP–2025–3951; FRL–13212–01– OCSPP] Pesticide Experimental Use Permit; Receipt of Application; Comment Request (December 2025)
- Posted
- May 6, 2026
- Comment period
- May 6, 2026 – Jun 6, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-08808
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Ecological impact | Precautionary principle concerns | Public notification and comment period |
|---|
2 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 5, 2026Comment submitted by Kristi DavisonOpposeIndividual
An individual opposes the proposed action, expressing concerns about the ecological impact of eradicating a species and the potential for sterile mosquitoes to still transmit diseases. The commenter argues against the feasibility and safety of the project.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Anonymous public commentOpposeIndividual
A private individual from Florida opposes the issuance of pesticide experimental use permits, expressing concern that large corporations will use states as "guinea pigs" for testing with unknown negative side effects. The commenter urges the EPA to prioritize environmental protection over corporate interests.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Comment submitted by Jessica MoseleyOpposeIndividual
A private citizen from Vermont opposes the issuance of experimental use permits for mosquito-related projects, specifically citing concerns about "Google Mosquitoes" and gene-altering measures. The commenter argues that such projects pose unknown risks to human health, wildlife, and the natural world, and urges the EPA to deny approval.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Anonymous public commentOpposeIndividual
An individual is urging the EPA to deny the proposal to release 64 million laboratory-modified mosquitoes in Florida and California. The commenter argues that the scale of the release poses unknown long-term ecological risks and that the burden of proof for safety has not been sufficiently met.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Comment submitted by Cynthia OwensOtherIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 5, 2026Anonymous public commentOpposeIndividual
Mario C opposes the EPA's proposal to release laboratory-modified mosquitoes in Florida and California due to concerns about irreversible ecological consequences and the lack of long-term safety data. The commenter argues that the burden of proof should rest on the proponents to provide independent, long-term evidence of safety before such a large-scale biological intervention occurs.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Comment submitted by Lorraine S. (no surname provided)OpposeIndividual
Lorraine S. opposes the proposed release of laboratory-modified mosquitoes in Florida and California, citing concerns over the irreversible nature of biological interventions in complex ecosystems. The commenter argues that the EPA should require more independent, long-term ecological studies to prove the absence of significant risks before granting authorization.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Comment submitted by Crystal WulffOpposeIndividual
The commenter, an individual, opposes the EPA's proposal to release 64 million laboratory-modified mosquitoes in Florida and California. They argue that the scale of the release poses unpredictable ecological risks and demand independent, long-term studies to prove environmental safety before authorization is granted.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Comment submitted by Amber GibsonOpposeIndividual
Amber Gibson, a concerned citizen, opposes the issuance of an Experimental Use Permit for Google LLC's release of Wolbachia-treated mosquitoes. She argues that the release poses risks to ecosystems, lacks long-term health data, and deprives local residents of informed consent.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Anonymous public commentOpposeIndividualRead comment →
