Anonymous public comment

AnonymousOpposeIndividual
Summary: A Florida resident and small homesteader opposes the proposed release of laboratory-modified mosquitoes, arguing that the scale of the release poses irreversible risks to complex ecosystems. The commenter requests that the EPA require more comprehensive long-term studies and independent reviews before granting approval.
To Whom It May Concern: I respectfully urge the EPA to deny or delay approval of the proposed release of up to 64 million laboratory-modified mosquitoes into Florida and California until more comprehensive long-term studies can be conducted and independently reviewed. As a Florida resident, mother, small homesteader, and citizen who cares deeply about responsible stewardship of our environment, I recognize the value of scientific innovation and the desire to reduce mosquito-borne illnesses. My concern is not with scientific advancement itself, but with the scale and permanence of this proposed environmental intervention. Natural ecosystems are extraordinarily complex. While the intended outcome may be population suppression of a targeted mosquito species, ecological systems rarely respond in simple and predictable ways. The removal or alteration of one species can create ripple effects throughout food webs, competing insect populations, wildlife habitats, and broader environmental systems that may not become apparent for years. What gives me pause is that once millions of living organisms are released into open environments, there is no practical mechanism to reverse the decision if unintended consequences emerge. Unlike a laboratory study or controlled field test, a release of this magnitude becomes an experiment conducted within shared public ecosystems. I believe the burden of proof should rest with those proposing the release. Before moving forward, the public deserves strong evidence demonstrating not only short-term effectiveness but also long-term ecological safety. Models and projections are valuable tools, but they cannot fully account for decades of environmental interactions, adaptation, and unforeseen outcomes. As someone who works daily with the realities of agriculture, land stewardship, and raising children who will inherit the consequences of today's decisions, I believe prudence is warranted. Responsible leadership requires weighing not only potential benefits but also potential risks, especially when those risks may be irreversible. I respectfully request that the EPA require additional long-term ecological studies, expanded environmental impact assessments, and independent review before authorizing a release of this scale. Thank you for considering my comments and for your commitment to protecting both public health and environmental integrity.

View on Regulations.gov