Clarification of Discretionary Employment Authorization for Certain Aliens

An individual who assisted a Ukrainian family expresses strong opposition to the proposed action, arguing that it would cause significant financial hardship for hardworking immigrants who are already self-sufficient. The commenter argues that the policy unfairly restricts the ability of people who love and support the country to work.

The commenter opposes making employment authorization discretionary for certain aliens, arguing that a rule-based system provides predictability and meets workforce needs. They express concern that a discretionary system will create uncertainty, increase administrative burdens, and lead to inconsistent outcomes.

The commenter opposes making employment authorization discretionary for certain aliens, arguing that a rule-based system provides predictability and meets workforce needs. They express concern that a discretionary system will create uncertainty, increase administrative burdens, and lead to inconsistent outcomes.

The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that it places unnecessary restrictions on the ability of legal temporary residents to work. They advocate for more flexibility to allow individuals to work, freelance, and support themselves without relying on public benefits.

An individual representing the Ukrainian community requests that USCIS continue to provide timely Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) for eligible Ukrainians. The commenter argues that legal work authorization provides essential financial stability for families fleeing the war and benefits American employers and communities.

The commenter supports the fast-tracking of work authorizations for Ukrainians, arguing that it benefits American employers, local markets, and the economy. They highlight the significant tax contributions and job creation by Ukrainian-led enterprises in the United States.

A Ukrainian parolee expresses support for the action, requesting that the government not make it harder for Ukrainian parolees to receive work authorization and improve processing times. The commenter emphasizes the need for legal work permits to support their family and maintain employment.

The commenter, a broadcast maintenance engineer who arrived under the Uniting for Ukraine program, opposes the proposed rule because it creates uncertainty and administrative burdens for humanitarian parolees who are already self-sufficient and compliant with the law. They argue that the rule could unfairly penalize employees for their employers' administrative decisions and that continued employment should be a predictable process based on objective standards.