Clarification of Discretionary Employment Authorization for Certain Aliens

The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it unfairly strips Afghan allies of their right to work while they wait for government-delayed processing. They contend the rule is arbitrary, violates federal court rulings, and ignores the reliance interests of those the U.S. government brought to the country.

An individual who is currently awaiting a decision on their employment authorization renewal supports the proposed rule. They argue that providing continued work authorization during processing delays is fair and beneficial for both workers and employers.

The commenter, a survivor of sexual assault and domestic abuse, opposes the proposed regulation because it threatens the stability and work authorization of U visa applicants. They argue that the regulation ignores the humanitarian purpose of the U visa program and will cause significant financial and emotional hardship for victims already facing long processing backlogs.

An individual is requesting the issuance of their employment authorization, citing the severe financial and personal impact of the current delay. They argue that they want to continue working and contributing to the country as a law-abiding resident.

An individual mother of three children supports the proposed action, arguing that timely work authorizations for Ukrainians are essential for family stability and the U.S. economy. She highlights the significant economic contributions and tax contributions made by Ukrainian-led businesses.

The commenter supports the timely issuance of work authorizations for Ukrainians, arguing that prompt work permits benefit U.S. employers, families, and the local economy. They emphasize that Ukrainians are already contributing to the economy through taxes and business ownership.

The commenter advocates for timely work authorization for Ukrainians, arguing that it is essential for the U.S. economy, local communities, and the well-being of families. They highlight the significant tax contributions and job creation provided by Ukrainian-backed businesses and entrepreneurs.

An individual is requesting that USCIS maintain and quickly process their employment authorization. They argue that losing the ability to work would cause severe financial hardship, including the inability to pay for basic living expenses like rent and food.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it unfairly strips Afghan allies of their right to work while they wait for government-delayed processing. They contend the rule is arbitrary, violates federal court rulings, and ignores the reliance interests of those the U.S. government brought to the country.