Clarification of Discretionary Employment Authorization for Certain Aliens

The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that restricting employment authorization for Ukrainian humanitarian parolees will reduce tax revenue, increase informal employment, and place a greater burden on local communities. They advocate for a more targeted approach that provides stable employment authorization to screened individuals to foster economic self-sufficiency and job creation.

Andrii Abramov, an individual from Seattle, opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it imposes unnecessary burdens on lawful residents and employers. He specifically objects to the "economic necessity" requirement, the E-Verify mandate for renewals, shortened validity periods without faster processing, and new automatic-termination triggers.

An individual representing the Ukrainian community requests that USCIS continue to provide timely Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) for eligible Ukrainians. The commenter argues that legal work authorization provides essential financial stability for families fleeing the war and benefits American employers and communities.

An individual mother of three children supports the proposed action, arguing that timely work authorizations for Ukrainians are essential for family stability and the U.S. economy. She highlights the significant economic contributions and tax contributions made by Ukrainian-led businesses.

The commenter supports the fast-tracking of work authorizations for Ukrainians, arguing that it benefits American employers, local markets, and the economy. They highlight the significant tax contributions and job creation by Ukrainian-led enterprises in the United States.

The commenter supports the timely issuance of work authorizations for Ukrainians, arguing that prompt work permits benefit U.S. employers, families, and the local economy. They emphasize that Ukrainians are already contributing to the economy through taxes and business ownership.

The commenter advocates for timely work authorization for Ukrainians, arguing that it is essential for the U.S. economy, local communities, and the well-being of families. They highlight the significant tax contributions and job creation provided by Ukrainian-backed businesses and entrepreneurs.

A Ukrainian parolee expresses support for the action, requesting that the government not make it harder for Ukrainian parolees to receive work authorization and improve processing times. The commenter emphasizes the need for legal work permits to support their family and maintain employment.

An individual Ukrainian resident supports the continued timely issuance and renewal of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) for eligible Ukrainians. The commenter argues that legal work authorization provides essential financial stability for families fleeing the war and benefits American employers and communities.

The commenter, a Ukrainian national under Humanitarian Parole, supports the action by requesting that DHS streamline EAD renewals and provide exemptions from restrictive requirements. They argue that administrative delays in processing work authorizations cause significant financial hardship and job losses for experienced workers.