Agency Information Collection Activities; Reinstatement, With Change, of a Previously Approved Collection for Which Approval Has Expired: Alien Change of Address
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Agency Information Collection Activities; Reinstatement, With Change, of a Previously Approved Collection for Which Approval Has Expired: Alien Change of Address
- Posted
- May 7, 2026
- Comment period
- May 6, 2026 – Jul 7, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09107
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Privacy and surveillance concerns | Public benefit disclosure requirements | Public charge enforcement concerns | Regulatory burden on immigrants | Statutory authority for expansion |
|---|
37 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 28, 2026Comment Submitted by AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter, an individual, opposes the proposed changes to the AR-11 form because they believe the added requirements regarding employment and means-tested benefits would be confusing and intimidating for human trafficking survivors and crime victims. They argue that these complexities could cause vulnerable individuals to abandon the care and benefits they are entitled to receive.
Read comment → - Jun 3, 2026Comment Submitted by Molly! MasichOpposeIndividual
The commenter argues that the proposed changes to Form AR-11 are illogical and will discourage non-citizens from updating their addresses. They claim that requiring extraneous information about public benefits and employment will confuse users and ultimately impede the collection of necessary address data.
Read comment → - May 13, 2026Comment Submitted by Eric JacobshagenOpposeIndividualRead comment →
