Agency Information Collection Activities; Reinstatement, With Change, of a Previously Approved Collection for Which Approval Has Expired: Alien Change of Address
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Agency Information Collection Activities; Reinstatement, With Change, of a Previously Approved Collection for Which Approval Has Expired: Alien Change of Address
- Posted
- May 7, 2026
- Comment period
- May 6, 2026 – Jul 7, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09107
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Privacy and surveillance concerns | Public benefit disclosure requirements | Public charge enforcement concerns | Regulatory burden on immigrants | Statutory authority for expansion |
|---|
37 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 6, 2026Comment Submitted by California WIC AssociationOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The California WIC Association opposes the proposed revisions to Form AR-11 that would require immigrants to disclose participation in public benefit programs like WIC. They argue that this requirement will create fear and a "chilling effect," discouraging eligible families from accessing essential nutrition and health services.
Read comment → - Jul 2, 2026Comment Submitted by The American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG)OpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG) opposes the proposed changes to Form AR-11 that require immigrants to report means-tested public benefits. They argue that this data collection will create barriers to healthcare, disproportionately affect women and families, and discourage individuals from utilizing essential programs like Medicaid and SNAP.
Read comment → - Jun 30, 2026Comment Submitted by AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 25, 2026Comment Submitted by Cathy SandstromOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed immigration fee rules, arguing that the 30-day deadline to pay the $100 fee is unreasonable for asylum seekers facing language and financial barriers. They request that cases not be dismissed without adjudication and that more time be provided for compliance.
Read comment → - Jun 9, 2026Comment Submitted by David LevitinOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 2, 2026Comment Submitted by dee STRADLINGOpposeIndividualRead comment →
