Considering Lands with Wilderness Characteristics Manual 6320 91 FR 35996

Great Old Broads for Wilderness opposes any revisions to BLM Manual 6320 that would weaken protections for lands with wilderness characteristics. They argue that the existing guidance provides a necessary, stable framework for conservation and public trust that should be maintained to protect these resources for future generations.

The commenter opposes any revisions to BLM Manual 6320 that would weaken protections for lands with wilderness characteristics. They argue that motorized vehicles, roads, and logging cause permanent damage to wilderness character and ecological health, and urge the BLM to maintain existing standards.

The commenter, a private individual, opposes any revisions to Manual 6320 that would weaken protections for lands with wilderness characteristics. They argue that the existing standards should be preserved to ensure the full implementation of the Wilderness Act and to protect these lands as a legacy for future generations.

An individual is expressing opposition to any updates that would weaken wilderness and wild lands management policies. They urge the agency to prioritize long-term preservation over short-term exploitation to protect ecological integrity and natural heritage.

An individual is opposing any revisions to BLM Manual 6320 that would weaken protections for wilderness study areas and lands with wilderness characteristics. The commenter argues that such changes would prioritize private interests over the preservation of public lands.

Lesley Obermayer opposes any updates to BLM Manual 6320 that would reduce protections for lands with wilderness characteristics. The commenter argues that once these lands are degraded by roads or motorized vehicles, the damage is permanent and urges the BLM to maintain current conservation policies.

An individual commenter opposes any revisions to BLM Manual 6320 that would weaken protections for wilderness areas or lands with wilderness characteristics. They argue that the agency should prioritize public good and environmental protection over the interests of private corporations.

The commenter, a private individual, opposes the proposed updates to BLM Manual 6320, arguing that the current framework for managing Wilderness Study Areas and Lands with Wilderness Characteristics is effective and should be maintained. They express concern that the review process could be used to weaken existing protections.

An individual commenter opposes any revisions to BLM Manual 6320 that would weaken protections for wilderness areas. They advocate for increased conservation, reduced motorized vehicle use, and science-based management that prioritizes local residents and wildlife habitat over resource extraction.