Fee Adjustment for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Form I–246, Application for a Stay of Deportation or Removal

Pangea Legal Services, a non-profit immigration defense organization, opposes the proposed fee increase for Form I-246, arguing that the 387% hike will create insurmountable financial barriers for vulnerable families facing medical emergencies and humanitarian hardships. They contend that the rule lacks a rational connection to the facts, fails to provide evidence that fee waivers are a viable safeguard, and threatens due process by pricing individuals out of critical legal remedies.

The commenter opposes the fee adjustment for Form I–246, arguing that the proposed increase significantly exceeds the rate of inflation since 1989. They also contend that government efficiencies and digitalization should lower costs, while criticizing the administration's spending on immigration enforcement.

The National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC), a legal service provider and advocacy organization, opposes the proposed fee adjustment for Form I-246. They argue that the fee is based on a faulty analysis of ICE's workload, creates an insurmountable financial barrier to due process for low-income immigrants, and is unnecessary given the agency's significant taxpayer funding.

A private individual opposes the proposed fee increase for Form I-246, arguing that the nearly 400% hike is unfair and unnecessary. They contend that the higher cost will create a barrier to accessing the legal immigration system for average families.

An individual is opposing the proposed fee increase for Form I-246, arguing that the $600 hike creates an insurmountable financial burden for essential workers and immigrants. They contend that the increase is arbitrary, does not reflect inflation or improved processing efficiency, and unfairly penalizes those seeking to document their legal status.

An individual is opposing the proposed fee increase for Form I-246, arguing that the $600 jump creates an insurmountable financial burden for low-income individuals and is disproportionate to inflation. The commenter highlights that the new fee would be financially ruinous for many and requests that the agency maintain the current fee or choose a much lower amount.

An individual is opposing the proposed fee increase for Form I-246, arguing that the $600 jump creates an insurmountable financial barrier for low-income individuals facing deportation. They also contend that the increase is disproportionate to inflation and lacks a demonstrated need for improved processing efficiency.

An individual is opposing the proposed fee increase for Form I-246, arguing that the $600 jump creates an insurmountable financial barrier for low-income immigrants facing removal. They also contend that the increase is disproportionate to inflation and lacks justification based on improved processing efficiency.

An individual is opposing the proposed fee increase for Form I-246, arguing that the jump from $155 to $755 is unreasonable and creates a significant financial barrier for those facing deportation. They express concern that the high cost will prevent people from accessing legal options and suggest that the fee should be tied to improvements in processing efficiency instead.

An individual is opposing the proposed fee increase for Form I-246, arguing that the $600 jump creates an insurmountable financial barrier for low-income individuals facing deportation. They also contend that the increase is disproportionate to inflation and lacks a demonstrated need for improved processing efficiency.