Fee Adjustment for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Form I–246, Application for a Stay of Deportation or Removal
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Fee Adjustment for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Form I–246, Application for a Stay of Deportation or Removal
- Posted
- May 7, 2026
- Comment period
- May 7, 2026 – Jul 7, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09007
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Fee adjustment for inflation | Fee amount and deterrent effect | Fee amount for removal orders | Fee increase impact on accessibility | Form i-246 fee increase |
|---|
6 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 6, 2026Comment Submitted by Community Legal Aid Society, Inc.OpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Community Legal Aid Society, Inc. (CLASI), a non-profit law firm, opposes the proposed fee increase for Form I-246, arguing that the change is arbitrary, capricious, and based on faulty data. They contend that the increase creates insurmountable financial barriers for vulnerable populations and note that ICE has received significant new federal funding that should cover these costs.
Read comment → - Jul 4, 2026Comment Submitted by Patrick SochorOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the fee adjustment for Form I–246, arguing that the proposed increase significantly exceeds the rate of inflation since 1989. They also contend that government efficiencies and digitalization should lower costs, while criticizing the administration's spending on immigration enforcement.
Read comment → - Jul 2, 2026Comment Submitted by Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC)OpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC), a national non-profit organization, opposes the proposed fee increase for Form I-246, Application for a Stay of Deportation or Removal. They argue the 387% increase is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act, as it lacks a reasoned justification, fails to account for the significant reliance interests of low-income immigrants, and creates a prohibitive financial barrier to life-saving legal relief.
Read comment → - Jul 1, 2026Comment Submitted by Ariel ThelanderOpposeIndividual
An individual opposes the proposed fee increase for Form I-246, arguing that the agency does not rely on this specific fee for operations and should instead manage its own budget. The commenter contends that high fees create a barrier to discretionary relief and that the financial burden of enforcement costs should not be shifted to applicants.
Read comment → - Jun 28, 2026Comment Submitted by AnonymousOtherIndividual
The commenter acknowledges the need for the Department of Homeland Security to recover costs but argues that the proposed fee increase from $155 to $755 is too large of a jump to implement all at once. They suggest a gradual increase over several years and a simplified fee waiver process to ensure the legal process remains accessible to low-income families.
Read comment → - Jun 21, 2026Comment Submitted by Judy SilversteinOpposeIndividual
Judy Silverstein, a private resident of Spokane, Washington, opposes the proposed fee increase for Form I-246. She argues that the nearly 400% increase imposes an insurmountable financial burden on low-income individuals and harms the broader community by affecting the labor supply for essential services.
Read comment → - May 11, 2026MM1 Comment Submitted by Marcia StevensonSupportIndividual
Marcia Stevenson supports the proposed fee increase for Form I-246. She argues that the current fee has not been adjusted for inflation since 1989 and does not reflect the increased administrative and enforcement costs associated with modern immigration.
Read comment → - May 7, 2026Comment Submitted by D PSupportIndividualRead comment →
- May 7, 2026Comment Submitted by AnonymousSupportIndividualRead comment →
