A local resident and outdoor enthusiast who uses the Caribou Targree National Forest opposes the proposal to narrow the public's right to comment on Forest Service directives. They argue that public participation is essential for accountability and that the Forest Service should maintain its 2018 commitment to including Handbooks in the public comment process.

An individual whitewater enthusiast and wilderness user opposes the rule change that would remove public comment requirements for Forest Service Manual and Handbook updates. They argue that public input is a vital tool for preventing poor land-use decisions and preserving the ecological and personal value of public lands like the Frank Church Wilderness.

A long-time coastal resident opposes the proposal to withdraw public comment access for Forest Service directive changes. The commenter argues that public input is essential for informed decision-making and protecting the local environment and economy.

Lauren Benefield, a recreational land user, opposes the proposed rule change that would limit public comment on Forest Service Manual and Handbook changes. She argues that public input is essential for ensuring that land-use decisions regarding grazing, timber, and mining are transparent and account for the interests of those who use the land.

A private citizen from Colorado opposes the proposal, arguing that it removes public oversight and democratic input regarding forest management. The commenter emphasizes the importance of public participation in environmental policy to protect natural resources for future generations.

A private citizen is opposing a rule change that would remove public comment requirements for changes to Forest Service Manuals and Handbooks. The commenter argues that these documents are critical for land management decisions and that public oversight is necessary to prevent poor land-use outcomes.

The commenter advocates for the protection of public lands and the preservation of robust public participation in land management decisions. They argue that diverse perspectives from various stakeholders are essential for balanced, sustainable management and that transparency is vital for maintaining public trust.

The commenter is a private individual who opposes the proposed rule change that would limit public comment on Forest Service Manuals and Handbooks. They argue that these documents are critical for land-use planning and that removing public oversight would prevent the identification of poor management decisions.