Comment on FR Doc # 2026-13281
AnonymousOpposeIndividual
Summary: A local resident and outdoor enthusiast who uses the Caribou Targree National Forest opposes the proposal to narrow the public's right to comment on Forest Service directives. They argue that public participation is essential for accountability and that the Forest Service should maintain its 2018 commitment to including Handbooks in the public comment process.
I’m writing to oppose this proposal to narrow the public’s right to comment on Forest Service directives. We live right next to the Caribou Targree national forest and trail ride, hike, and camp on this forest land. We enjoy seeing and living near all the wildlife this area has, as we are in the Greater Yellowstone area of impact. For many many years the Forest Service has done a very good job managing and protecting the forests under the presant rules. The rules and guidelines on public comments and participation have been very successful. There is no good reason to reduce any of these rights that we as people of these public lands should be cut out of decisions that effect our public lands. the decisions buried in these rulebooks shape every acre of it.
In 2018, the Forest Service concluded that its Handbooks contain standards and guidelines that directly affect the public, and it expanded public comment to cover them. That conclusion was correct. The Handbooks govern grazing permits, timber sale analysis, land management planning, and special-use decisions that shape these lands for everyone who depends on them. Changes to those guides deserve more public notice and comment, not less.
Public participation is how management of 193 million acres of public land stays accountable to the people who own it. That accountability is worth protecting. I urge the Forest Service to withdraw this proposal and preserve the public’s right to comment on directive changes, whether they appear in the Manual or the Handbooks.