An individual whitewater enthusiast and wilderness user opposes the rule change that would remove public comment requirements for Forest Service Manual and Handbook updates. They argue that public input is a vital tool for preventing poor land-use decisions and preserving the ecological and personal value of public lands like the Frank Church Wilderness.

A private citizen from Colorado opposes the proposal, arguing that it removes public oversight and democratic input regarding forest management. The commenter emphasizes the importance of public participation in environmental policy to protect natural resources for future generations.

The commenter advocates for the protection of public lands and the preservation of robust public participation in land management decisions. They argue that diverse perspectives from various stakeholders are essential for balanced, sustainable management and that transparency is vital for maintaining public trust.

The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that it threatens to undo centuries of land conservation efforts. They express strong personal outrage and call for the removal of the leader responsible for the action.

A recreational user of national forest land opposes the proposal to limit public comment on Forest Service handbooks. The commenter argues that these handbooks significantly impact public resources and that public participation is essential for maintaining accountability in land management.

The commenter argues that public lands are a fundamental American right and a cornerstone of the nation's identity. They advocate for the preservation of these lands and the protection of public access against any infringement or exploitation.

Lisa Murray, a private citizen from Ventura, California, opposes the proposed Forest Service rule. She argues that the current system is not broken and that the new rule will diminish public input while benefiting the wealthy at the public's expense.

A private citizen opposes the proposed rule change because it limits public input on Forest Service land management decisions. The commenter argues that the public deserves a say in how public lands are managed and requests that the Forest Service keep Manual and Handbook changes open to public comment.