Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Section 2 of the Mid-States Corridor Project: Tier 2 National Environmental Policy Act
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Section 2 of the Mid-States Corridor Project: Tier 2 National Environmental Policy Act
- Posted
- Jun 1, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 1, 2026 – Jul 2, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-10919
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Opposition to mid-states corridor | Opposition to new highway construction |
|---|
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 30, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 26, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
A private individual opposes the construction of the Mid-States Corridor project in Dubois County, Indiana. They argue that the project should be stopped in favor of improving US Highway 231, which they claim would be safer, more cost-effective, and less environmentally damaging.
Read comment → - Jun 9, 2026anonymous anonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual resident opposes the construction of the Mid-States Corridor project in Dubois County, Indiana. They argue that the project should be stopped and that the government should instead focus on improving US Highway 231 as a more cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative.
Read comment → - Jun 9, 2026Gardner PainterOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 7, 2026Stanley & Kathy SchnausOpposeIndividual
A local resident and farmer opposes the Mid-States Corridor project in Dubois County. They argue that the project is unnecessary because repairing and adding passing lanes to Highway 231 would be a more cost-effective solution that preserves farmland and homesteads.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Deidra ChurchOpposeIndividual
A resident of Martin County opposes the construction of the Mid-States Corridor, arguing that the project would cause unnecessary environmental and financial costs. The commenter suggests that the Federal Highway Administration should instead prioritize improvements to existing infrastructure, such as U.S. Highway 231, to address local safety and transportation needs.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Betty FendelOpposeIndividual
An individual resident of Dubois County, Indiana, opposes the construction of the Mid-States Corridor project. They argue that the project is unnecessary and suggest that improving US Highway 231 would be a more cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Sally Gogel FischerOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the Mid-States Corridor Project, arguing that the project is unnecessarily expensive and would destroy valuable farmland. They suggest that funds should instead be used to repair existing roads like Hwy 64 and Hwy 231.
Read comment → - Jun 4, 2026Catie FlemingOpposeIndividual
A local resident opposes the project, arguing that the $3.4 billion in taxpayer funds should be reallocated to repair existing roads and bridges across Indiana. The commenter notes that the majority of residents in their community do not want the new road and suggests that improving current infrastructure would be more beneficial.
Read comment → - Jun 4, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the construction of the Mid-States Corridor project in Dubois County, Indiana. They argue that improving US Highway 231 would be a more cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative for improving safety and economic development.
Read comment →
