Prohibiting the Importation and Marketing of Certain Foreign-Produced Military-Grade Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (UAS) and UAS Critical Components for Non-U.S. Government, Including Those with Swarming Capabilities

The commenter, a commercial remote pilot, opposes the proposed import ban on foreign-produced drones and components. They argue that the policy will increase costs for small businesses, stifle innovation by creating a monopoly-like environment, and cause the U.S. to fall behind globally in drone technology.

The commenter opposes the ban on foreign-produced military-grade UAS, arguing that it will harm small businesses, lead to significant financial losses for companies with existing equipment, and limit access to life-saving technology. They also contend that domestic alternatives lack the scale, quality, and capability of the prohibited products.

The commenter, identifying as a small business owner, opposes the ban on foreign-produced military-grade UAS and components. They argue that the ban will harm small businesses, increase costs for consumers, degrade infrastructure, and reduce America's global competitiveness and safety.

An electrical engineer and ex-military member opposes the proposed ban on foreign-produced drones, arguing that the decision lacks engineering data and will hinder search and rescue efforts. The commenter suggests that other technologies, like cell phones, pose greater security risks and requests a reconsideration of the action.

Greg Poulin, a videographer and real estate media professional, opposes the proposed ban because it would deprive small businesses and farmers of affordable, high-quality drones equipped with lidar. He argues that the measure will harm various industries and suggests implementing background checks for purchasers instead of a total ban.

John Russell, a commercial drone pilot, opposes the proposed ban on foreign-produced drones because he cannot afford U.S.-made alternatives. He argues that the ban will significantly disrupt commercial activities and leave small business owners with unusable equipment.

The commenter opposes the proposed ban on foreign-produced military-grade drones, arguing that the government has provided no evidence of security threats and that the ban unfairly manipulates the free market. They highlight that many industries rely on foreign drones (like DJI) for essential services such as search and rescue, agriculture, and cinematography, and warn that the broad definitions could harm safety and economic interests.