Medicare Program; Supplemental Proposed Changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Supplemental Proposed Fiscal Year 2011 Rates
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Medicare Program; Supplemental Proposed Changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Supplemental Proposed Fiscal Year 2011 Rates
This proposed rule is a supplement to the fiscal year (FY) 2011 hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) and long-term care prospective payment system (LTCH PPS) proposed rule published in the May 4, 2010 Federal Register. This supplemental proposed rule would implement certain statutory provisions relating to Medicare payments to hospitals for inpatient services that are contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively known as the Affordable Care Act). It would also specify statutorily required changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the rates for Medicare acute care hospital inpatient services for operating costs and capital related costs, and for long term care hospital costs.
- Posted
- May 21, 2010
- Comment period
- May 21, 2010 – Jun 3, 2010
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 3, 2010Avera HealthAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jun 2, 2010GHA Center for Rural HealthSupportTrade association
The Georgia Hospital Association Center for Rural Health supports the proposed rule, specifically the payment adjustments for low-volume hospitals. They argue that reducing the distance requirement to "15 road miles" will improve access to covered benefits for rural Medicare beneficiaries.
Read comment → - Jun 1, 2010Indiana UniversityOpposeIndividual
An individual is opposing a proposed Medicare code change that would preclude gastroparesis as a primary diagnosis. The commenter argues that this change would make it difficult for patients to cover the costs of total parenteral nutrition, potentially leading to life-threatening consequences for those with the disorder.
Read comment → - May 28, 2010Elmhurst HospitalAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- May 28, 2010CGH Medical CenterAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- May 27, 2010Digestive Disease National CoalitionOpposeAdvocacy
The Digestive Disease National Coalition (DDNC) opposes adding gastroparesis (code 536.3) to the "unacceptable principal diagnosis" edit in the Medicare Code Editor. They argue that for patients with idiopathic gastroparesis, there is no underlying disorder to sequence first, and removing the code would prevent these patients from having a billable diagnosis.
Read comment → - May 27, 2010Intermountain Medical CenterAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jun 1, 2010AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual is opposing a proposed change to Medicare coverage that would exclude treatment for idiopathic gastroparesis. The commenter argues that this decision will lead to life-threatening consequences for their family member and other patients.
Read comment → - May 28, 2010Kerry RossSupportIndividualRead comment →
- May 27, 2010HeatherOpposeIndividual
An individual with idiopathic gastroparesis opposes the proposed Medicare coverage changes, stating that the decision to exclude coverage for this condition will leave them unable to afford essential treatments like IV nutrition and medications.
Read comment →
