Medicare Program; Supplemental Proposed Changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Supplemental Proposed Fiscal Year 2011 Rates

CMS-2010-0176-0003NPRM
Comments
12
Last activity Jun 3, 2010
Deadline
Closed on Jun 3, 2010
Closed Jun 3, 2010
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-25%
-25% excluding campaigns
Document

Details

The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.

Title
Medicare Program; Supplemental Proposed Changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Supplemental Proposed Fiscal Year 2011 Rates

This proposed rule is a supplement to the fiscal year (FY) 2011 hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) and long-term care prospective payment system (LTCH PPS) proposed rule published in the May 4, 2010 Federal Register. This supplemental proposed rule would implement certain statutory provisions relating to Medicare payments to hospitals for inpatient services that are contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively known as the Affordable Care Act). It would also specify statutorily required changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the rates for Medicare acute care hospital inpatient services for operating costs and capital related costs, and for long term care hospital costs.

Posted
May 21, 2010
Comment period
May 21, 2010 – Jun 3, 2010
Analysis

Overview

What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.

Include campaigns
Analyzed 8 of 12 comments
67%· analysis in progress

Stance breakdown

-25%
Net support
Support3Oppose5Not yet analyzed4
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -25% across organic comments.

Who commented

Breakdown by commenter type.

Individual
5
Trade association
1
Advocacy
1
Other
1
Not yet analyzed
4

Comments over time

Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.

Posted May 21, 2010Deadline Jun 3, 2010
May 24May 31
Support3Oppose5Other0

Support × commenter type

How each type splits across stance.

Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
20%
80%
0%
Trade association
100%
0%
0%
Advocacy
0%
100%
0%
Other
100%
0%
0%

Issues raised

The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.

Comments

Explorer

Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.