Medicare Program; Proposed Changes to the Hospital IPPS for Acute Care Hospitals & the LTCH PPS and Fiscal Year 2011 Rates; Effective Date of Provider Agreements & Supplier Approvals; and Hospital Conditions of Participation for Rehabilitation & Respiratory Care Services

CMS-2010-0176-0001NPRM
Comments
44
Last activity Jun 22, 2010
Deadline
Closed on May 7, 2010
Closed May 7, 2010
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
+59%
+59% excluding campaigns
Document

Details

The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.

Title
Medicare Program; Proposed Changes to the Hospital IPPS for Acute Care Hospitals & the LTCH PPS and Fiscal Year 2011 Rates; Effective Date of Provider Agreements & Supplier Approvals; and Hospital Conditions of Participation for Rehabilitation & Respiratory Care Services

We are proposing to revise the Medicare hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (IPPS) for operating and capital-related costs of acute care hospitals to implement changes arising from our continuing experience with these systems. In addition, in the Addendum to this proposed rule, we describe the proposed changes to the amounts and factors used to determine the rates for Medicare acute care hospital inpatient services for operating costs and capital related costs. These proposed changes would be applicable to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2010. We also are setting forth the proposed update to the rate of increase limits for certain hospitals excluded from the IPPS that are paid on a reasonable cost basis subject to these limits. The proposed updated rate-of-increase limits would be effective for cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2010. We are proposing to update the payment policy and the annual payment rates for the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient hospital services provided by long-term care hospitals (LTCHs). In the Addendum to this proposed rule, we also set forth the proposed changes to the payment rates, factors, and other payment rate policies under the LTCH PPS. These proposed changes would be applicable to discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2010. We are proposing changes affecting the Medicare conditions of participation for hospitals relating to the types of practitioners who may provide rehabilitation services and respiratory care services. We are proposing changes affecting the determination of the effective date of provider agreements and supplier approvals under Medicare. Finally, we are proposing to offer psychiatric hospitals, hospitals with inpatient psychiatric programs, and psychiatric facilities that are not hospitals increased flexibility in obtaining accreditation to participate in the Medicaid program. Psychiatric hospitals would have the choice of meeting the existing regulatory requirements to participate in Medicare as a psychiatric hospital or to obtaining accreditation from a national accrediting organization whose psychiatric hospital accrediting program has been approved by CMS. Hospitals with inpatient psychiatric programs would have the choice of meeting the existing regulatory requirements for participation in Medicare as a hospital or obtaining accreditation from a national accrediting organization whose hospital accreditation program has been approved by CMS. In addition, psychiatric facilities that are not hospitals would be afforded the flexibility in obtaining accreditation by a national accrediting organization whose program has been approved by CMS, or by any other accrediting organization with comparable standards that is recognized by the State.

Posted
Apr 20, 2010
Comment period
Apr 20, 2010 – May 7, 2010
Analysis

Overview

What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.

Include campaigns
Analyzed 17 of 44 comments
39%· analysis in progress

Stance breakdown

+59%
Net support
Support12Oppose2Other3Not yet analyzed27
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is +59% across organic comments.

Who commented

Breakdown by commenter type.

Individual
12
Advocacy
1
Other
3
Academic
1
Not yet analyzed
27

Comments over time

Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.

Posted Apr 20, 2010Deadline May 7, 2010
Apr 19Apr 26May 3May 17Jun 21
Support12Oppose2Other3

Support × commenter type

How each type splits across stance.

Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
83%
8%
8%
Other
0%
33%
67%
Advocacy
100%
0%
0%
Academic
100%
0%
0%
Comments

Explorer

Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.