Regulations Defining Engaged in the Business as a Dealer in Firearms
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Regulations Defining Engaged in the Business as a Dealer in Firearms
- Posted
- May 6, 2026
- Comment period
- May 6, 2026 – Aug 5, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-08919
- CFR
- 27 CFR Part 478
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Definition of "engaged in business" | Second amendment rights |
|---|---|---|
Gun Owners of America AdvocacyOppose Gun Owners of America and Gun Owners Foundation oppose the proposed rule, arguing that it fails to sufficiently walk bac |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 8 comments from the past week
8 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 22, 2026Teresa BlumensteinOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 22, 2026Monet LahnOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 21, 2026Mackenzie DoyleOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 18, 2026Sandra HostetlerOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 18, 2026Sister Maryann MuellerOpposeIndividual
The commenter, identifying as a person of faith, opposes the proposed rule because they believe it creates loopholes for criminal actors and straw purchasers by allowing unlicensed sellers to avoid background checks and record-keeping.
Read comment → - Jul 17, 2026Anne BylerOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 13, 2026Alex Tanyi jrSupportIndividualRead comment →
- May 16, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the removal of the DOJ-added definitions but suggests adding a "safe harbor" provision for private sales. They argue that private sales conducted by a Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL) with a background check should exempt the seller from being classified as "engaged in the business."
Read comment → - May 15, 2026Jay StallardSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the proposed action to rescind Biden-era expansions to the "engaged in the business" definition for firearms dealers. They argue that the previous regulations improperly imposed federal requirements on private sales and that this revision protects Second Amendment rights by returning to the original statutory text.
Read comment → - May 12, 2026Phillip HagelSupportIndividual
Phillip Hagel, a private citizen and gun owner, supports the proposed rule to clarify the definition of "engaged in the business" as a firearms dealer. He argues that the rule is necessary to close loopholes for unlicensed high-volume sales and to enhance public safety by ensuring background checks are conducted.
Read comment →
