Firearms Transactions and Straw Purchases
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Firearms Transactions and Straw Purchases
- Posted
- May 6, 2026
- Comment period
- May 6, 2026 – Aug 5, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-08922
- CFR
- 27 CFR Part 478
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 27 comments from the past week
27 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 19, 2026National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc.SupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), representing the firearm industry, supports the proposed rule to clarify what constitutes a "straw purchase." They argue that the new regulations will provide much-needed clarity for federal firearms licensees (FFLs) to distinguish between illegal transactions and permissible activities like gifting or marital property transfers.
Read comment → - Jun 24, 2026Silencer Central / BANISH SuppressorsSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
The CEO of Silencer Central / BANISH Suppressors, a Federal Firearms Licensee, supports the proposed rule to codify straw purchasing laws into a single regulatory section. The commenter argues that the rule provides much-needed clarity but requests three specific refinements regarding age terminology, family relationship exclusions, and spousal payment conditions to ensure the rule is easily administrable at the point of sale.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Jarod LSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 22, 2026William PattersonSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 21, 2026Joe RodriguezSupportIndividual
An individual gun owner supports the proposed rule to clarify that lawful gift purchases between family members do not constitute straw purchases. They argue that the current ambiguity puts innocent owners at risk of prosecution and urge the ATF to finalize the rule.
Read comment → - Jul 21, 2026Joe JovinoSupportIndividual
An individual commenter supports the proposed rule to clarify that lawful gift purchases between family members do not constitute straw purchases. They argue that the current ambiguity puts innocent gun owners at risk of prosecution and urge the ATF to finalize the rule.
Read comment → - Jul 21, 2026Paul BarthSupportIndividual
An individual supports the proposed rule to clarify that lawful gift purchases between family members do not constitute straw purchases. The commenter argues that the current regulations represent regulatory overreach and put innocent gun owners at risk of prosecution.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026Josh AppleSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the proposed rule because they believe the criminalization of lawful gift purchases between family members is a regulatory overreach. They argue that a gift purchase between non-prohibited persons should not be considered a straw purchase.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026Vicki A. De La GarzaSupportIndividual
Vicki De La Garza supports the finalization of the rule regarding firearms transactions and straw purchases. She argues that the rule is good and notes that a paper trail should be sufficient for documenting legal firearm transfers between family members in different states.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026Felix M. De La GarzaSupportIndividual
Felix De La Garza supports the finalization of the rule regarding firearms transactions and straw purchases. He argues that the rule provides a necessary framework for legal firearm transfers, such as gifting firearms to out-of-state children, provided there is a paper trail.
Read comment →
