Operation Blazing Sword, Inc
AdvocacyOppose
Second amendment rights
Selecting Biological Sex on ATF Forms
ATF-2026-0010-0001NPRM
Comments
3,307
Last activity Aug 3, 2026
Deadline
0 days
Closes Aug 5, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
+35%
+35% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Selecting Biological Sex on ATF Forms
- Posted
- May 6, 2026
- Comment period
- May 6, 2026 – Aug 5, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-08932
- CFR
- 27 CFR Parts 478, 479, 555
- Topics
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Analyzed 3,304 of 3,307 comments
100%· analysis in progress
Stance breakdown
+35%
Net support
Support2,202Oppose1,046Other56Not yet analyzed3
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is +35% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Business
5
Individual
3,294
Advocacy
2
Other
3
Not yet analyzed
3
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted May 6, 2026Deadline Aug 5, 2026
May 4May 18Jun 1Jun 15Jun 29Jul 13Jul 27Aug 3
Support2,202Oppose1,046Other56
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
67%
32%
2%
Business
40%
60%
0%
Other
33%
33%
33%
Advocacy
0%
100%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Second amendment rights698
Gender identity disclosure requirements352
Unconstitutional infringement on 2nd amendment198
Government overreach and waste180
Limitation of gun owner freedoms157
Lgbtq+ firearm access rights147
Privacy and data collection123
Discrimination and relevance concerns113
Government overreach and religious liberty90
Constitutional rights and state authority71
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Second amendment rights | Constitutional rights and state authority | Historical tradition of regulation | Lgbtq+ firearm access rights | Limitation of gun owner freedoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Operation Blazing Sword, Inc AdvocacyOppose Operation Blazing Sword, Inc. | · | · | · | · |
2 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- 20 comments from the past week
20 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 28, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 28, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule to select biological sex on ATF forms, arguing that it is unconstitutional and based on identity politics. They contend that the right to bear arms belongs to all "PEOPLE" regardless of gender.
Read comment → - Jul 28, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 28, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 28, 2026Ian PersingOpposeIndividual
An individual opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it creates a "catch-22" that could unfairly deny citizens their Second Amendment rights based on physical stature. The commenter expresses concern that this action represents a slippery slope toward further restricting firearm rights.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026L. KimbellOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 24, 2026Samuel InmanOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 24, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that requiring biological sex on ATF forms could conflict with state IDs and lead to unwarranted denials of sales. They contend that the proposal is counter-intuitive for accurate background checks and violates Second Amendment rights.
Read comment → - Jul 24, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 24, 2026Samuel KlossOpposeIndividualRead comment →