An independent consultant specializing in autonomous systems safety opposes the proposal to remove manual brake control requirements. The commenter argues that removing this hardware safeguard without a mandated, verifiable safety mechanism shifts liability to manufacturers and creates a safety gap for passengers.

Persistence Analytics Group LLC supports the modernization of FMVSS No. 135 to remove requirements for human-driver controls in vehicles designed for automated driving systems. However, they argue that the new standards must require rigorous, transparent evidence regarding software reliability, failure modes, and cybersecurity to ensure safety without manual overrides.

A motorist opposes the proposal to remove manual controls from autonomous vehicles, arguing that these controls are necessary for human intervention during system malfunctions. The commenter contends that removing these interfaces would create safety risks and necessitate specialized towing services for vehicles that become "confused" or stuck.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that removing steering and braking controls from vehicles is unsafe and based on unreliable automated driving systems. They express concern that the change will be difficult to reverse once implemented and recommend rejecting the rule.

Monica Jensen argues that removing the option for a manual emergency brake in autonomous vehicles is dangerous due to the potential for computer malfunctions and hacking. She contends that passengers must have the ability to override the vehicle's computer to ensure safety in unpredictable real-world scenarios.

The commenter argues against removing human intervention capabilities from autonomous vehicle systems. They contend that human intervention is necessary to correct errors made by the humans who designed the autonomous systems.

The commenter argues that all AI-driven vehicles must be required to include physical steering wheels, brake pedals, and accelerators to allow for human override. They contend that manual controls are a necessary redundancy to protect against software failures, hardware malfunctions, and cybersecurity threats.

The commenter expresses concern over the safety and liability of autonomous vehicles that lack manual overrides. They argue that manufacturers should face stricter accountability, including potential criminal charges, if software or hardware failures lead to accidents or loss of life.