FR-6518-P-01 Equal Access to Housing in HUD Programs Revisions

The National Affordable Housing Management Association (NAHMA) opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it creates legal uncertainty, administrative burdens, and potential conflicts with state and local laws. They specifically express concern that the rule could weaken Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) protections and create invasive compliance requirements for housing providers.

Regional Housing Legal Services (RHLS), a regional nonprofit law firm, opposes the proposed rule because it compels faith-based and mission-driven housing providers to act in ways that conflict with their religious beliefs. They argue the rule violates the First Amendment, imposes unconstitutional conditions on federal funding, and risks reducing the capacity of the nonprofit network that provides essential housing services.

Wyatt, a private individual, opposes the proposed revisions to the Equal Access Rule. They argue that the changes would remove protections for transgender, nonbinary, and intersex people and exacerbate housing discrimination against marginalized groups who are already economically disadvantaged.

Jamie Menio opposes the proposed revisions to the Equal Access Rule, arguing that they would remove protections for transgender, nonbinary, and intersex individuals. The commenter contends that redefining "sex" in a restrictive way could lead to discrimination and unsafe conditions for people seeking housing assistance.

Kass, an individual, opposes the proposed revisions to the Equal Access Rule, arguing that they would remove protections for transgender, nonbinary, and intersex people. The commenter contends that the changes would facilitate discrimination and create unsafe conditions for marginalized communities seeking housing assistance.

Erin K. McCleary, a licensed mental health professional, opposes the proposed revisions to the Equal Access Rule. She argues that the changes would remove critical protections for transgender, nonbinary, and intersex individuals, potentially leading to discrimination and unsafe housing conditions.

Rev. Kellie Kelly, representing the Miami Valley Unitarian Universalist Fellowship, opposes the proposed revisions to the Equal Access Rule. The commenter argues that the changes would remove protections for transgender, nonbinary, and intersex individuals and lead to discrimination and unsafe conditions in housing services.

Patti Held opposes the proposed revisions to the Equal Access Rule, arguing that they would remove protections for transgender, nonbinary, and intersex individuals. She contends that the changes could lead to discrimination and unsafe conditions by allowing providers to require documentation or proof of sex.

Jael Diringer opposes the proposed revisions to the Equal Access Rule, arguing that the changes would remove protections for transgender, nonbinary, and intersex individuals. The commenter contends that redefining "sex" in a restrictive manner will lead to discrimination and unsafe conditions for marginalized people seeking housing assistance.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule change, arguing that it constitutes a deliberate attempt to discriminate against transgender Americans. They assert that all citizens have equal rights regardless of gender identity and that the proposal is discriminatory.