Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Performance Evaluation Studies on Wastewater Laboratories (Renewal)
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Performance Evaluation Studies on Wastewater Laboratories (Renewal)
Federal Register for Thursday, May 21, 2026 (91 FR 29954) [FRL-10383.1-01-OECA]
- Posted
- May 21, 2026
- Comment period
- May 21, 2026 – Jul 21, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-10191
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 17, 2026Anonymous public commentSupportOther
The commenter supports granting Florida a DMRQA exemption because the state's existing NELAP accreditation program already requires proficiency testing and provides sufficient regulatory oversight. They argue that the current DMRQA reporting process creates a duplicative administrative burden without providing additional quality assurance benefits.
Read comment → - Jul 8, 2026Anonymous public commentOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed information collection, arguing that the DMR-QA program creates an undue burden on permit holders. They suggest that the agency should rely on existing TNI laboratory certifications from accrediting bodies instead of collecting additional DMR-QA information.
Read comment → - Jul 1, 2026Comment submitted by Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.SupportIndividual
A commercial laboratory representative argues that wastewater laboratories should have more flexibility to choose and schedule performance testing (PT) studies to support their DMRQA reporting. They suggest this change would align WET laboratory requirements with analytical parameter requirements and help reduce laboratory certification costs.
Read comment → - Jun 29, 2026Anonymous public commentOtherIndividual
The commenter suggests that the current proficiency testing requirements are not very useful for permittees. They argue that a more effective requirement would be for laboratories to provide permittees with their scope of accreditation and specific method detection and reporting limits.
Read comment →
