Prediction Markets; Public Interest Determinations - Proposed Rules
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Prediction Markets; Public Interest Determinations - Proposed Rules
- Posted
- Jun 12, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 12, 2026 – Jul 28, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-11854
- CFR
- 17 CFR Part 40
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Sports wagering integrity and controls | Insider information risk | Resolvability and settlement integrity |
|---|---|---|---|
Gambit Gamer, Inc. BusinessSupport Joseph Sky Ryu, CEO of Gambit Gamer, Inc., supports the proposed framework for public-interest determinations regarding | · | · | |
Tonto Apache Tribe GovernmentOppose The Tonto Apache Tribe opposes the proposed rules because they could allow prediction-market contracts to function as sp | · | ||
Wanna.com / Wanna Parlay / Morris Packaging BusinessSupport Jim Bob Morris, founder of Wanna.com and Wanna Parlay, supports the proposed action to strictly enforce public interest | · | · |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 2 comments from the past week
2 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jun 27, 2026April AvantSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the Commission's recognition of the public benefits of prediction markets, particularly those related to climate risk management and price discovery. They urge the Commission to adopt strong safeguards to protect constitutional rights, personal privacy, and against the use of non-public information for individualized determinations.
Read comment →
