Prediction Markets; Public Interest Determinations - Proposed Rules
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Prediction Markets; Public Interest Determinations - Proposed Rules
- Posted
- Jun 12, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 12, 2026 – Jul 28, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-11854
- CFR
- 17 CFR Part 40
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Sports wagering integrity and controls | Insider information risk | Resolvability and settlement integrity |
|---|---|---|---|
Gambit Gamer, Inc. BusinessSupport Joseph Sky Ryu, CEO of Gambit Gamer, Inc., supports the proposed framework for public-interest determinations regarding | · | · | |
Tonto Apache Tribe GovernmentOppose The Tonto Apache Tribe opposes the proposed rules because they could allow prediction-market contracts to function as sp | · | ||
Wanna.com / Wanna Parlay / Morris Packaging BusinessSupport Jim Bob Morris, founder of Wanna.com and Wanna Parlay, supports the proposed action to strictly enforce public interest | · | · |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 495 comments from the past week
495 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 11, 2026PinHigh Sports LLCSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
PinHigh Sports LLC submits a comment in support of the proposed rules regarding prediction markets. The company argues that the rules provide necessary clarity and oversight while protecting the integrity of the markets and the interests of participants.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Comment on CFTC-2026-1189, CFTC-2026-1189-0001, Leech Lake Band of OjibweOpposeGovernment📎 Attachment
The Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it threatens tribal sovereignty, violates the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), and lacks proper consumer protections for youth. They urge the CFTC to maintain existing categorical prohibitions on gaming-related event contracts and to engage in meaningful government-to-government consultation.
Read comment → - Jul 21, 2026Christopher CalaycaySupportIndividual
Christopher Calaycay, a trader and investor, supports the proposed rule because it uses a contract-by-contract review process rather than blanket bans. He argues that keeping these markets on regulated U.S. exchanges protects consumers and recognizes the value of price discovery and information.
Read comment → - Jul 19, 2026Timothy MassadOpposeAcademic📎 Attachment
Timothy G. Massad, a former CFTC chairman and current academic at Harvard University, opposes the proposed rules, arguing that the CFTC is overstepping its jurisdiction by attempting to regulate sports betting and prediction markets. He contends that the agency is mischaracterizing its mission, misinterpreting statutory definitions of "swaps," and creating an impractical and illusory review process.
Read comment → - Jun 12, 2026M WiltonOtherIndividualRead comment →
