Revising Firearms Transaction Record

A concerned parent opposes the proposed revisions to firearms transaction records, arguing that the changes would roll back gun safety measures and increase community violence. The commenter specifically expresses opposition to loosening restrictions for individuals with mental illness and allowing the mailing of firearms.

The commenter opposes the proposed regulation, arguing that it infringes on Second Amendment rights, fails to improve public safety, and wastes taxpayer money on "culture war nonsense."

An individual gun owner opposes the proposed rule changes, arguing that rolling back the USPS mailing ban and loosening restrictions on individuals with mental illness or substance abuse disorders would compromise public safety. The commenter shares a personal experience of violence to emphasize the dangers of allowing firearms to remain accessible to those with severe impairments.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it would deregulate firearms for individuals with mental illness and open the "gun show loophole." They also allege that the changes are corrupt and intended to financially benefit the Trump family through specific online retail provisions.

A pediatric ED nurse opposes the revision of firearms transaction records, arguing that loosening gun regulations increases violence and endangers children. The commenter emphasizes the need for smarter safety measures to preserve lives rather than prioritizing the interests of firearm organizations.

A former educator opposes the proposed rule changes, arguing that they would lift regulations on gun show sales and allow firearms to be sold to individuals with a history of mental illness. The commenter emphasizes the need for stricter measures to protect students and teachers from gun violence and mass shootings.

The commenter supports updating the background check questionnaire to reflect the United States v. Hemani decision, arguing that law-abiding medical marijuana patients should not be dispossessed of their firearm rights. They contend that the current system unfairly penalizes honest citizens while relying on an unverifiable self-reporting system.