Federal Register Notice
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Federal Register Notice
- Posted
- May 14, 2026
- Comment period
- May 14, 2026 – ?
- FR Doc
- 91 FR 28096
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 10, 2026Akerman LLPSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
James Martin Vanities, a manufacturer and retailer of luxury bathroom vanity cabinets, supports the proposed safeguard remedy on quartz surface products. They specifically advocate for onshoring agreements and "de-stacking" of tariffs to encourage domestic production expansion while maintaining access to a diverse range of products.
Read comment → - Jun 10, 2026Lotte Chemical California, Inc.OpposeBusiness📎 Attachment
Lotte Chemical California, Inc. (LCCA) opposes the proposed global Section 201 safeguard on quartz surface products, arguing that it would cause significant downstream harm to U.S. fabricators and consumers. The company advocates for using ongoing Section 301 proceedings to address China-driven overcapacity instead, or alternatively, implementing country-specific tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) and product-specific exclusions.
Read comment → - Jun 1, 2026Save Quartz JobsOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Save Quartz Jobs Coalition, supported by various industry representatives and legal counsel, opposes the imposition of tariffs and quotas on quartz surface products. They argue that such trade-restrictive measures will harm the U.S. industry by reducing demand, increasing costs for downstream fabricators, exacerbating the housing affordability crisis, and leading to significant job losses.
Read comment → - May 28, 2026TINTAS GRANITE & FLOORING, LLCOpposeBusiness
A quartz industry business owner opposes the proposed safeguard petition and any additional tariffs on quartz products. They argue that such measures would increase costs for consumers and builders, hurt small businesses, and lead to job losses and slower economic growth.
Read comment → - May 28, 2026Elida's Stone Tops and Tile, LLCOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- May 22, 2026Factory Plaza IncOpposeIndividual
An individual is urging the Administration to reject the proposed tariffs and import caps on quartz surface products. They argue that these trade restrictions will cause catastrophic economic damage, including significant job losses and reduced revenue for small businesses and the home building industry.
Read comment → - May 29, 2026Employee GebauerOpposeBusiness
A family-owned fabrication business owner argues that the proposed tariffs are causing material costs to rise, making their products unaffordable for homeowners. They state that these costs are leading to a loss of business and threaten the company's ability to retain its 15 employees.
Read comment → - May 29, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeBusiness
Doug Bishop of Custom Stone LLC, a fabrication business, argues that tariffs on imported engineered quartz surfaces hurt his business and decrease sales. He requests that the government stop the added tariffs on these products.
Read comment → - May 28, 2026Comment from Alma GraniteOpposeBusiness
Alma Granite, a business in the downstream quartz surface products market, opposes the implementation of new tariffs or import quotas. They argue that such measures would cause severe price hikes, material shortages, and economic strain on small businesses due to insufficient domestic production capacity.
Read comment → - May 28, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOtherIndividualRead comment →
