FR-6524-P-01 Housing and Community Development Act of 1980: Verification of Eligible Status

The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that it will negatively impact low-income families and children who are already facing housing instability. They express concern that the proposal will lead to displacement and a lack of safe housing for those in need.

Jackson Yi, a resident of Nevada and a volunteer at a Catholic Worker center, opposes the proposed rule regarding the verification of eligible status. The commenter argues that the rule would lead to increased homelessness and expresses concern that it fails to provide adequate support for vulnerable populations.

A lifelong resident of Los Angeles opposes the proposed rule change regarding eligibility for housing assistance based on immigration status. The commenter argues that the change would lead to thousands of evictions, increase homelessness, and negatively impact the stability of families and children.

Dhannon Henson opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it will harm low-income individuals and families by reducing affordable housing. The commenter expresses concern that the action will lead to homelessness and make it harder for families to live together.

Lois MacGillivray opposes the proposed rule because it would eliminate prorated housing assistance for mixed-status families, potentially displacing thousands of people and causing housing instability for children. She urges HUD to withdraw the rule, extend the comment period, or at least apply any changes prospectively to future applicants only.

Margaret Collins, a private citizen, opposes the proposed rule because it would eliminate prorated housing assistance for mixed-status families and potentially displace thousands of people. She argues that the rule would cause significant harm to children and suggests that if the rule is adopted, it should only apply to future applicants rather than current participants.

An individual named Sondhan opposes the proposed changes to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1980. The commenter argues that the changes will harm families and community development, and they request that the proposal be rejected.

The commenter opposes HUD's proposal to change the rule on verification of eligibility under Section 214 of the Housing and Community Development Act. They argue that the proposal unjustly focuses on the residents of the 48 states and that the government should instead provide extra funds to help keep families in their homes rather than evicting them.

The commenter opposes HUD's proposal to change the rule on verification of eligibility under the Housing and Community Development Act. They argue that the proposal is incomprehensible and that the homelessness problem is already severe enough that the rule change will not negatively affect families with children.

The commenter opposes HUD's proposal to change the eligibility verification rules under Section 214 of the Housing and Community Development Act. They argue that the change will skew government data and unfairly impact low-income individuals, working families, and those who have been evicted.