FR-6524-P-01 Housing and Community Development Act of 1980: Verification of Eligible Status

The commenter expresses opposition to HUD's proposed rule changes regarding the verification of eligibility under Section 214 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1980. The provided text is largely illegible and contains significant noise, but the commenter explicitly states they are writing to oppose the proposal.

An individual is submitting a comment expressing opposition to HUD's proposed rule change regarding the verification of eligibility under Section 214 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1980. The comment appears to be a handwritten form letter with significant portions of the text illegible or obscured.

A lifelong resident of Los Angeles opposes the proposed rule change regarding eligibility for housing assistance based on immigration status. The commenter argues that the change would lead to thousands of evictions, increase homelessness, and negatively impact the stability of families and children.

Lois MacGillivray opposes the proposed rule because it would eliminate prorated housing assistance for mixed-status families, potentially displacing thousands of people and causing housing instability for children. She urges HUD to withdraw the rule, extend the comment period, or at least apply any changes prospectively to future applicants only.

Margaret Collins, a private citizen, opposes the proposed rule because it would eliminate prorated housing assistance for mixed-status families and potentially displace thousands of people. She argues that the rule would cause significant harm to children and suggests that if the rule is adopted, it should only apply to future applicants rather than current participants.

The commenter opposes HUD's proposal to change the rule on verification of eligibility under Section 214 of the Housing and Community Development Act. They argue that the proposal will further disadvantage low-income people and that the current requirements should remain as they are.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule on verification of eligibility under Section 214 of the Housing and Community Development Act. They argue that the new requirements will create a significant administrative burden for housing providers and may lead to the loss of housing for low-income individuals.

The commenter opposes HUD's proposal to change the rule on verification of eligibility under the Housing and Community Development Act. They argue that the proposal is incomprehensible and that the homelessness problem is already severe enough that the rule change will not negatively affect families with children.

The commenter opposes HUD's proposal to change the eligibility verification rules under Section 214 of the Housing and Community Development Act. They argue that the change will skew government data and unfairly impact low-income individuals, working families, and those who have been evicted.

The commenter opposes HUD's proposal to change the rule on verification of eligibility under Section 214 of the Housing and Community Development Act. They argue that the change will negatively impact children and families who rely on these programs for housing and stability.