Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuer Anti-Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism Program and Sanctions Compliance Program Requirements
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuer Anti-Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism Program and Sanctions Compliance Program Requirements
- Posted
- Apr 10, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 10, 2026 – Jun 10, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-06963
- CFR
- 31 CFR Part 502
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Blockchain analytics integration | Deterministic existence verification | Multi-issuer model compatibility | Technical compliance and architectural diversity | Use of verifiable digital credentials |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aplus Eth Corporation BusinessSupport Aplus Eth Corporation, representing a multi-issuer payment stablecoin model, supports the proposed rulemaking provided i | · | · | · | · | |
Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) Trade associationSupport The Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) supports the proposal to require stablecoin issuers to have the technica | · | · | · | · | |
Elliptic Inc. BusinessSupport Elliptic Inc., a blockchain analytics provider, supports the proposed AML/CFT and sanctions compliance rules for payment | · | · | · | · | |
Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) AdvocacySupport The Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) supports the proposed rulemaking and advocates for the integration | · | · | · | · | |
YEE! Technologies, LLC BusinessSupport YEE! | · | · | · | · |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 9, 2026Opacity Labs, Inc.SupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Opacity Labs, Inc. supports the proposed rulemaking but urges FinCEN to provide explicit regulatory clarity regarding the use of decentralized, distributed networks for BSA and sanctions compliance. The company argues that the current lack of clarity hinders the adoption of innovative technologies like their "Verified Data Network," which they claim can improve security, efficiency, and real-time risk propagation for permitted payment stablecoin issuers.
Read comment → - Jun 9, 2026America's Credit UnionsSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
America’s Credit Unions supports the proposed modernized BSA and sanctions framework for stablecoin issuers but requests further clarification on operational gaps. They specifically seek guidance on the delineation of responsibilities between parent credit unions and their stablecoin subsidiaries, as well as illustrative examples of non-prescriptive controls for blockchain forensics and KYC.
Read comment → - Jun 8, 2026TRM LabsSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
TRM Labs, a blockchain intelligence company, supports the proposed rule but advocates for specific enhancements to maximize the technology's effectiveness. They argue the final rule should explicitly codify standards for the "freeze-burn-reissue" pipeline, recognize stablecoin financial intelligence units (FIUs), and provide safe harbor protections for risk-based compliance actions.
Read comment → - Jun 17, 2026Comment from ChainalysisSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Chainalysis, Inc. supports the proposed rulemaking under the GENIUS Act, viewing it as a necessary step to establish national standards for stablecoin AML/CFT and sanctions compliance. The company argues that the final rule should specifically recognize continuous, automated blockchain analytics as a foundational compliance tool and establish clear data quality standards to differentiate between deterministic structural claims and probabilistic intelligence.
Read comment →
