Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuer Anti-Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism Program and Sanctions Compliance Program Requirements
FINCEN-2026-0100-0001Proposed Rule
Comments
62
Awaiting comments
Deadline
Closed on Jun 10, 2026
Closed Jun 10, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
+95%
+95% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuer Anti-Money Laundering/Countering the Financing of Terrorism Program and Sanctions Compliance Program Requirements
- Posted
- Apr 10, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 10, 2026 – Jun 10, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-06963
- CFR
- 31 CFR Part 502
- Topics
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
+95%
Net support
Support60Oppose1Other1
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is +95% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Business
27
Individual
5
Trade association
5
Advocacy
25
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted Apr 10, 2026Deadline Jun 10, 2026
Jun 1Jun 8Jun 15
Support60Oppose1Other1
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Business
96%
4%
0%
Advocacy
100%
0%
0%
Individual
80%
0%
20%
Trade association
100%
0%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Operational flexibility for lawful orders15
Technical compliance and architectural diversity13
Use of verifiable digital credentials6
Use of distributed networks4
Blockchain analytics integration2
Risk-based compliance approach2
Deterministic existence verification1
Multi-issuer model compatibility1
Reserve custody concentration risk1
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Blockchain analytics integration | Deterministic existence verification | Multi-issuer model compatibility | Technical compliance and architectural diversity | Use of verifiable digital credentials |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aplus Eth Corporation BusinessSupport Aplus Eth Corporation, representing a multi-issuer payment stablecoin model, supports the proposed rulemaking provided i | · | · | · | · | |
Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) Trade associationSupport The Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) supports the proposal to require stablecoin issuers to have the technica | · | · | · | · | |
Elliptic Inc. BusinessSupport Elliptic Inc., a blockchain analytics provider, supports the proposed AML/CFT and sanctions compliance rules for payment | · | · | · | · | |
Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) AdvocacySupport The Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) supports the proposed rulemaking and advocates for the integration | · | · | · | · | |
YEE! Technologies, LLC BusinessSupport YEE! | · | · | · | · |
Aplus Eth Corporation
BusinessSupport
Multi-issuer model compatibility
Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS)
Trade associationSupport
Technical compliance and architectural diversity
Elliptic Inc.
BusinessSupport
Blockchain analytics integration
Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF)
AdvocacySupport
Use of verifiable digital credentials
YEE! Technologies, LLC
BusinessSupport
Deterministic existence verification
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
