Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Section 2 of the Mid-States Corridor Project: Tier 2 National Environmental Policy Act
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Section 2 of the Mid-States Corridor Project: Tier 2 National Environmental Policy Act
- Posted
- Jun 1, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 1, 2026 – Jul 2, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-10919
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Opposition to mid-states corridor | Opposition to new highway construction |
|---|
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 23, 2026Lochmueller GroupOpposeIndividual📎 Attachment
Virginia LaGrange, a long-time resident of Dubois County, opposes the Mid-States Corridor project. She argues that the corridor would bypass local businesses, hurting the local economy, and would increase truck traffic beyond what the existing roads can handle. She suggests that funds should instead be used to improve current county roads.
Read comment → - Jun 23, 2026Lochmueller GroupOpposeIndividual📎 Attachment
The commenters, including Erin McCaig, Candice, and Shawn Michelle Sims, express strong opposition to the Mid-States Corridor project, arguing that it threatens homes, heritage farms, and the community way of life in Southern Indiana. Additionally, owners of Betico Creek Farms request specific engineering protections, environmental safeguards, and a commercial-based property valuation if the project proceeds.
Read comment → - Jun 10, 2026Betico Creek Farms LLCSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Betico Creek Farms LLC, an agricultural enterprise, supports the project but requests specific technical requirements and rigorous modeling in the Tier 2 Environmental Impact Statement. They argue that the EIS must specifically address heavy-haul machinery turning radii, bridge load capacities, hydrological impacts on their private lake, and the prevention of land fragmentation to protect their farming operations.
Read comment → - Jun 5, 2026Jasper Pub 'N' GrubOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 5, 2026Crooked Creek Food Service LLCOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 4, 2026Church Avenue LLCOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 6, 2026Emily WaylandOtherOther📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 6, 2026Steve KrampeOpposeIndividual📎 Attachment
Steve Krampe, a private citizen from Ferdinand, Indiana, opposes the Mid-States Corridor project, arguing that it is a fiscally irresponsible "vanity project" that would devastate local communities and Amish lands. He advocates for redirecting the proposed federal funding toward repairing and maintaining existing highway infrastructure instead of constructing a new corridor.
Read comment → - Jul 6, 2026Charles and Doris SengOtherOther📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 6, 2026Sierra Club Hoosier Chapter - CommentsOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Sierra Club Hoosier Chapter opposes the Mid-States Corridor project, arguing that the long-term environmental costs—including significant impacts on forests, wetlands, and 88 species of concern—outweigh any short-term economic benefits. They request that the Tier 2 EIS specifically address wildlife habitat loss, vehicle collisions, and the impact on local geological sites and community enjoyment.
Read comment →
