1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-Hexamethylcyclopenta [g]-2-Benzopyran (HHCB) and Phthalic Anhydride Draft Risk Evaluations Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA); Notice of Availability and Request for Comment
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- 1,3,4,6,7,8-Hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-Hexamethylcyclopenta [g]-2-Benzopyran (HHCB) and Phthalic Anhydride Draft Risk Evaluations Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA); Notice of Availability and Request for Comment
Federal Register for Tuesday, April 14, 2026 (91 FR 19134) [FRL-13309-01-OCSPP]
- Posted
- Apr 14, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 14, 2026 – Jun 16, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-07167
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | De minimis threshold | Occupational exposure assessment | Occupational exposure limits | Product use and risk |
|---|
5 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 15, 2026Comment submitted by American Coatings Association (ACA)OpposeTrade association📎 Attachment
The American Coatings Association (ACA) opposes the EPA's draft risk evaluation of phthalic anhydride, arguing that the EPA overestimates exposure levels in end-use products by conflating resin manufacturing with downstream paint formulation. The association contends that phthalic anhydride is largely consumed during the resin-making process, leaving only trace amounts in final products, and requests that the EPA use updated Safety Data Sheets (SDS) and more representative scientific studies.
Read comment → - Jun 15, 2026Comment submitted by China WTO/TBT National Notification & Enquiry CenterOtherGovernment📎 Attachment
The People’s Republic of China submitted comments regarding the draft risk evaluations for HHCB and Phthalic Anhydride. The government requests that the EPA recognize equivalent overseas safety measures, clarify specific high-risk conditions of use to avoid broad trade restrictions, and provide precise definitions for "spray-type" consumer products.
Read comment → - Jun 15, 2026Comment submitted by Aerospace Industries Association (AIA)OtherTrade association📎 Attachment
The Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) provides feedback on the EPA's draft risk evaluation for phthalic anhydride, emphasizing its critical role in aerospace and defense manufacturing. They request clarification on specific conditions of use (COUs) to ensure accurate classification and propose a performance-based approach for personal protective equipment (PPE) rather than prescribing specific glove models.
Read comment → - Jun 12, 2026Comment submitted by Beyond PlasticsSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Beyond Plastics, an organization working to eliminate plastic pollution, urges the EPA to strengthen its draft risk evaluation of phthalic anhydride. They argue that the EPA should better account for fenceline community exposures, aggregate exposures, risks to susceptible populations (such as pregnant individuals), and the chemical's role in the broader toxic plastic supply chain.
Read comment → - Jun 12, 2026Comment submitted by The Chemical Company (TCC)OpposeBusiness
The Chemical Company, a chemical distributor, argues that Phthalic Anhydride does not pose a risk to workers or consumers because it is transformed during production and does not remain in the final product. They state they cannot provide specific exposure data as they are not involved in manufacturing or end-use.
Read comment →
