Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System: Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities; Federal CCR Permit Program
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System: Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities; Federal CCR Permit Program
Federal Register for Thursday, May 28, 2026 (91 FR 31684) [FRL-7080-06-OLEM]
- Posted
- May 28, 2026
- Comment period
- May 28, 2026 – Jul 30, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-10641
- CFR
- 40 CFR Parts 22, 124, and 257
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Permit time limits | Coal ash disposal regulations |
|---|---|---|
American Electric Power (AEP) BusinessSupport American Electric Power (AEP), a large electric utility, supports the EPA's proposed federal CCR permit program. | ||
Large Public Power Council (LPPC) Trade associationSupport The Large Public Power Council (LPPC), an association of 29 large public power systems, supports the establishment of a | · |
5 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 29, 2026Comment submitted by Cynthia OsikaSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 29, 2026Comment submitted by Candace CorsonOpposeIndividual
A parent and medical doctor opposes the proposed action, arguing that it "loosens" coal ash cleanup requirements and risks further contamination of water, land, and food with toxins like mercury. The commenter advocates for stricter protections for public health and the environment.
Read comment → - Jun 29, 2026Anonymous public commentSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 29, 2026Comment submitted by Denise DowellOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 29, 2026Comment submitted by Elaine MarverSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 28, 2026Comment submitted by Gail LudwigSupportIndividual
A resident of Northwest Indiana expresses concern over groundwater contamination from unremediated coal ash pits, specifically mentioning NIPSCO. The commenter urges the agency to take action to alleviate the situation and protect municipal drinking water sources.
Read comment → - Jun 28, 2026Comment submitted by Mckenzie SnellgroveOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 28, 2026Comment submitted by Lauren CoonOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed use of one-size-fits-all general permits for coal ash disposal, arguing that individual site reviews are necessary to protect water quality and public health. They specifically highlight the need for site-specific protections in areas near water, neighborhoods, and farms.
Read comment → - Jun 28, 2026Comment submitted by Abigail JohnsonOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed changes to the Federal CCR Permit Program, specifically the shift toward state-led implementation and the proposed tiering system. They argue that the EPA should maintain direct oversight to ensure strict regulation and prevent water pollution from coal combustion residuals.
Read comment → - Jun 28, 2026Comment submitted by William BorlandSupportIndividual
An individual expresses concern about water pollution and climate change, urging the protection of water resources. The commenter supports the action by advocating against the destruction of water and groundwater resources.
Read comment →
