National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities and Natural Gas Transmission and Storage Facilities; Technology Review and Reconsideration
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities and Natural Gas Transmission and Storage Facilities; Technology Review and Reconsideration
Federal Register for Wednesday, April 22, 2026 (91 FR 21672) (FRL-5732-02-OAR)
- Posted
- Apr 22, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 22, 2026 – Aug 7, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-07800
- CFR
- 40 CFR Part 63
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Cumulative impact evaluation | Scope of 112(d)(6) technology review |
|---|
2 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 12, 2026Comment submitted by Christina StantonSupportIndividualRead comment →
- May 21, 2026Comment submitted by Andrea KaySupportIndividual📎 Attachment
A medical oncologist argues that rolling back the proposed regulations will lead to increased rates of cancer and other respiratory diseases in Americans. The commenter cites peer-reviewed medical research to support the claim that petroleum production and transmission facilities contribute to significant health risks.
Read comment → - May 20, 2026Comment submitted by Hip Hop CaucusSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Hip Hop Caucus, an advocacy organization focused on environmental justice, urges the EPA to strengthen the proposed rule by regulating previously unregulated emission points and preventing "backsliding" from major-source reclassifications. They also advocate for faster compliance timelines for natural gas-driven process controllers and require more transparent public reporting and accountability for facilities in overburdened communities.
Read comment →