Begin Actual Construction in the New Source Review Preconstruction Permitting Program

Molly G. Prince urges the EPA not to change or dilute existing environmental protocols and restrictions regarding the construction of structures like data centers. The commenter argues that environmental impact studies and due diligence must be completed before any construction begins, rather than expediting the process.

Lara Chamberlain, a resident of Centerville, UT, opposes the proposed rule because she believes it does not provide sufficient environmental safeguards against large polluting sources like data centers and power plants. She argues that the rule could lead to increased chronic illness and heavy costs for local communities.

Georgia Lawrence, representing the Sierra Club, opposes the proposed revisions to the New Source Review air-permitting regulations. The commenter argues that the changes would allow data centers to bypass necessary oversight regarding air emissions, noise, and water use, potentially harming communities and the environment.

Margaret Landreau, a private citizen, opposes the proposed changes to the New Source Review Preconstruction Permitting Program. She argues that the current permitting process is essential for protecting public health and air quality, and expresses concern that "fast-tracking" or circumventing these safeguards would benefit developers at the expense of the public.

Ron and Susan Munson oppose the proposal to allow construction to begin before full compliance with air quality standards is ensured. They argue that the EPA must strictly enforce existing regulations to protect human health and the environment from political or economic interests.

Michaelene Brown, a private citizen, opposes the proposed rule to begin construction in the New Source Review Preconstruction Permitting Program. She argues that the proposal creates shortcuts for fossil fuel and AI infrastructure developers, bypassing environmental reviews and threatening public health and community transparency.

Sabrina Lemos expresses support for maintaining rigorous air permitting standards to ensure thorough environmental and health impact reviews before construction begins. She advocates for robust New Source Review standards that prioritize public engagement and finalized permits before irreversible project steps are taken.

Ms. K. Shae opposes the proposal to allow construction to begin before final air permit approvals are received. She argues that maintaining rigorous permitting standards is essential to protect public health, ensure transparency, and assess environmental impacts before major industrial projects commence.

Richard Conrad, an individual, supports the EPA's efforts to maintain stringent air quality regulations and the New Source Review permitting process. He argues that complete air permit approvals must be secured before major construction begins to protect public health and evaluate environmental impacts.

Evan, a private individual, supports the proposed action to require complete air permit approvals before major construction begins. The commenter argues that these safeguards are essential for protecting public health and evaluating environmental impacts like climate effects and cumulative burdens.