Begin Actual Construction in the New Source Review Preconstruction Permitting Program

Emily Rich, a private individual, opposes the proposed changes to the New Source Review Preconstruction Permitting Program. She argues that the proposal could reduce public oversight and that major construction should not begin without a thorough review and approval of final air permits to protect public health and the environment.

Mary Ricketts, representing Friends of the Earth, opposes the proposed revisions to the New Source Review (NSR) air permitting regulations. She argues that allowing construction to begin before permits are issued will undermine public input and allow harmful projects, such as large data centers, to proceed without proper vetting.

A private individual named Jessica is requesting that construction not be allowed to begin before the permitting process is complete. She argues that U.S. citizens have a right to be informed about the potential health and environmental impacts of projects.

Hannah Hecox expresses support for maintaining rigorous air permitting processes and comprehensive environmental assessments before construction begins. She argues that these protections are essential for public health and ensuring communities are informed about potential pollution from industrial projects.

Markell McCubbin, representing Salt Lake Arts Academy, opposes the proposed changes to the New Source Review Preconstruction Permitting Program. The commenter argues that the EPA should maintain stringent permitting safeguards to ensure thorough environmental and public health reviews before construction begins.

Emily Moran, a private individual, opposes the proposed action to begin construction before final air permit approval. She argues that maintaining robust New Source Review requirements is essential for protecting public health and ensuring community awareness of environmental impacts before projects proceed.

RJ Adler of Adler Accounting opposes the proposed action to begin construction before preconstruction permits are finalized. The commenter argues that stringent air permit protocols and public oversight are essential to protect community health and environmental safeguards before major projects commence.

Ashley Walcott, a concerned citizen, supports the proposed action to require finalized air permits before construction begins. The commenter argues that these safeguards are necessary to protect public health and ensure community engagement regarding potential pollution sources.

Sharelle Rodman expresses support for maintaining rigorous air quality standards and stringent New Source Review permitting requirements. The commenter argues that the EPA should mandate final air permit approvals before any major project construction begins to ensure public oversight and environmental protection.

C Straw, a private individual, opposes the proposed action to allow construction to begin before final air permits are secured. The commenter argues for maintaining stringent New Source Review requirements to protect public health and ensure thorough environmental impact assessments before projects commence.