Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Aug 7, 2026Jennifer Partyka MSN RNOpposeIndividual
A registered nurse expresses strong opposition to the proposed CMS changes, arguing that the administration lacks understanding of healthcare complexities. The commenter specifically criticizes plans regarding AI-administered care, Medicaid requirements for disabled patients, and prescription benefits for seniors.
Read comment → - Aug 6, 2026Anna B.SupportIndividual
Anna Bazil, a registered nurse, supports the proposed rule but urges CMS to ensure AI safety and protect nurse staffing levels. She advocates for the creation of specific codes to recognize and reimburse nursing work that prevents patient harm, which is currently bundled into other billing categories.
Read comment → - Aug 6, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed CMAA billing codes because they believe the codes would allow hospitals to bill for AI-performed clinical work without human oversight. They argue that this creates a financial incentive to prioritize algorithms over human clinicians and could lead to medical errors.
Read comment → - Aug 4, 2026Deborah L. CantlinSupportIndividual
A Registered Nurse with 40 years of experience supports CMS's efforts to reform CPT code valuation and reduce the AMA's influence. The commenter advocates for an independent, multidisciplinary body to value codes and expresses concern over the safety and validity of AI-supported care codes.
Read comment → - Aug 2, 2026Catherine DraperOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Aug 2, 2026Erica RayackOpposeIndividual
A nurse practitioner opposes the proposal to allow hospitals to bill for AI-assisted services, arguing it will lead to unnecessary use of technology, legal complications, and increased healthcare inequity. The commenter emphasizes that healthcare is a human practice and expresses concern over the costs and data safety implications for patients.
Read comment → - Aug 2, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the creation of a specific billing code for AI in hospitals, arguing that it would lead to the replacement of human medical staff with technology. They express concern that AI lacks the nuanced judgment of human providers and that prioritizing cost-saving over human care will negatively impact patient outcomes.
Read comment → - Aug 1, 2026Berry JiangOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 31, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the implementation of WISeR tests and the use of AI in medical decision-making. They argue for patient choice in doctors, the preservation of non-HMO Medicare plans, and a fee-for-service payment model.
Read comment → - Jul 30, 2026Alexandra FryOpposeIndividualRead comment →
