Management Designated Wilderness Areas Manual 6340 91 FR 35995 6.15.26
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Management Designated Wilderness Areas Manual 6340 91 FR 35995 6.15.26
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is seeking public comment on potential updates to BLM Manual 6340—Management of Designated Wilderness Areas and is interested in receiving information and recommendations regarding whether updates, clarifications, or other revisions to existing Manual 6340 may be appropriate.
- Posted
- Jun 15, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 15, 2026 – Aug 15, 2026
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 189 comments from the past week
189 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 31, 2026Comment on FR Doc # N/AOpposeIndividual📎 Attachment
An individual expresses strong opposition to any proposals that would reduce or weaken federal protections for BLM designated wilderness areas. They argue that preserving these areas is critical for addressing the climate and extinction crises and protecting biodiversity.
Read comment → - Jul 30, 2026Comment on FR Doc # N/AOpposeIndividual
An individual is expressing opposition to any updates that would weaken the management standards for wilderness and wild lands. They argue that the Department must prioritize long-term preservation over short-term exploitation to protect ecological integrity and cultural resources.
Read comment → - Jul 30, 2026Comment on FR Doc # N/AOpposeIndividual
John Lavin opposes the Department of the Interior's sweeping review of wilderness policies, specifically the updates to BLM Manual 6340. He argues that the current policies provide a proven and effective framework for protecting public land values, recreation, and ecological resources.
Read comment → - Jul 30, 2026Comment on FR Doc # N/AOpposeIndividual
Sheldon Shepherd opposes the proposed updates to the BLM Manual 6340 and other wilderness policies. He argues that the current policies provide a proven framework for protecting public land values, recreation, and ecological resources and urges the Department to leave them in place.
Read comment → - Jul 30, 2026Comment on FR Doc # N/AOpposeIndividual
Doug Ruffier opposes the Department of the Interior's sweeping review of wilderness policies, specifically the updates to BLM Manual 6340. He argues that the current policies provide a proven framework for protecting public land values, recreation, and ecological resources and urges the Department to leave them in place.
Read comment → - Jul 30, 2026Comment on FR Doc # N/AOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes any efforts to reduce the acreage of publicly protected lands or reduce protections for threatened and endangered species. They argue that federal officials are stewards of public land and that exploitation of these lands by private companies without public return is a "taking."
Read comment → - Jul 30, 2026Comment on FR Doc # N/AOpposeIndividual
Grant Alban opposes the Department of the Interior's sweeping review of wilderness policies, specifically the updates to BLM Manual 6340. He argues that the current policies provide a proven framework for protecting public land values, recreation, and ecological resources and urges the Department to leave them in place.
Read comment → - Jul 30, 2026Comment on FR Doc # N/AOpposeIndividual
Dr. Erich Pessl opposes the proposed updates to the Management of Designated Wilderness Areas manual, arguing that current policies already provide a proven framework for protecting public land values. He urges the Department of the Interior to leave existing policies in place to maintain ecological, cultural, and recreational benefits.
Read comment →
