Interstate Transport and Temporary Export of National Firearms Act Firearms

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it removes the pre-travel approval requirement for machine guns, short-barreled rifles, and destructive devices. They argue that maintaining government oversight is necessary for public safety and to prevent these weapons from entering prohibited areas.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it removes the pre-travel approval requirement for machine guns, short-barreled rifles, and destructive devices. They argue that maintaining government oversight is necessary for public safety and to prevent these weapons from entering prohibited areas.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe removing the pre-travel approval requirement for machine guns, short-barreled rifles, and destructive devices compromises public safety. They argue that maintaining government oversight is necessary to prevent these weapons from being moved into prohibited areas.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it removes the requirement for pre-travel approval for owners of machine guns, short-barreled rifles, and destructive devices. They contend that public safety should be prioritized over convenience by maintaining government oversight on the interstate transport of these weapons.

An individual is expressing strong support for the proposed rule to eliminate the requirement for advance ATF approval when transporting NFA-regulated firearms for short-term purposes. The commenter argues that the current requirement is an unconstitutional prior restraint that lacks historical basis and burdens law-abiding citizens without improving public safety.

A firearm owner supports the proposed rule because it would simplify the process for transporting NFA items like suppressors and SBRs across state lines for short visits. The commenter argues that the current requirement to submit requests to the ATF is a hassle that prevents many owners from bringing their legal firearms to see family or participate in target practice.

An individual commenter supports the proposal to eliminate advance notice and approval requirements for the short-term interstate transportation of lawfully registered NFA firearms. They argue that owners should not need federal permission to travel with legally possessed property and urge the agency to further minimize reporting requirements.

An individual commenter supports the proposed action, arguing that it would reduce the "disgusting" legal hurdles and administrative burdens placed on lawful NFA firearm owners. They contend that the change would simplify travel for multi-state property owners and allow law enforcement to focus resources on actual problems rather than "rubber stamping" lawful activities.

A law-abiding firearm owner supports the proposed rule to eliminate the ATF Form 5320.20 requirement for short-term interstate travel with NFA items. The commenter argues that the current process is a redundant administrative burden that hinders travel and training without providing any tangible public safety benefits.