EXPLORE Act Mandated Wilderness Climbing Guidance FR Notice
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- EXPLORE Act Mandated Wilderness Climbing Guidance FR Notice
- Posted
- Jun 15, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 15, 2026 – Aug 15, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-11959
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Climbing and anchor maintenance | Permitting process efficiency | Programmatic anchor authorization | Power drill authorization |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAG-VT AdvocacySupport CRAG-VT supports the EXPLORE Act and PARC Act as a means to recognize climbing as a sustainable recreational use of publ | · |
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Campaigns
Organized form-letter drives, separated from organic one-off comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 7 comments from the past week
7 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 31, 2026Comment from Friends of Joshua TreeSupportAdvocacy
Friends of Joshua Tree, a 501(c)(3) organization and park partner, supports the NPS draft climbing management guidance but recommends specific revisions. They advocate for programmatic authorizations for anchor maintenance, clearer permit timelines, and provisions for emergency anchor placement to balance climber safety with resource protection.
Read comment → - Jul 30, 2026Comment from Obed VenturaOtherIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 30, 2026Comment from Stacey ChenSupportIndividual
The commenter, a climber, supports the recognition of climbing as an appropriate wilderness activity and the allowance of fixed anchors. They request improvements to expedite the replacement of existing anchors and advocate for a clearer, programmatic authorization process for new climbing routes.
Read comment → - Jul 29, 2026Comment from Obed VenturaOtherIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 29, 2026Comment from Obed VenturaOtherIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 29, 2026Comment from Obed VenturaOtherIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 28, 2026Comment from Kevin YinSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the recognition of climbing as a legitimate wilderness activity and the use of fixed anchors for safety. They advocate for easier authorization processes for new routes and programmatic preauthorization for certain climbing areas to improve safety and accessibility.
Read comment → - Jul 28, 2026Comment from PAMELA CarterOpposeIndividual
An individual is opposing the proposed revision of wilderness climbing guidance that would redefine fixed climbing anchors as not being "installations" or "structures" under the Wilderness Act. The commenter argues that fixed anchors should remain subject to the Minimum Requirements Analysis and that the NPS should reject any date-based grandfather clauses for existing hardware.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Comment from Roger SemlerAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Jul 26, 2026Comment from Richard SportsmanSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the recognition of climbing as a Wilderness activity and the use of fixed anchors for safety. They urge the agencies to streamline the authorization process for new routes and expedite the replacement of existing anchors to ensure climber safety.
Read comment →
